Well I have to admit this certainly would be a nice feature to have but I can understand the undertaking that this would involve, maybe in the next evolution of ML?
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: nanomad on September 23, 2013, 11:01:47 AM
Correct, no changes since the last build
Quote from: newsense on September 19, 2013, 02:45:29 AMNegative iso? do you have access to a black hole? last I checked there is no such thing as negative iso but if now there is by all means do tell
Are zebras supposed to work with ML negative iso? With the latest build zebras don't work with negative iso.
Quote from: mkdevo on September 18, 2013, 09:34:32 PM
Hey all,
Apologies if this has been covered elsewhere, but I searched and couldn't find anything.
I finally installed ML on my T4i last night, and everything seemed to go well. But is it normal for the Exposure Level Indicator on the LCD to obstruct the bottom of the ML screen? Any way to get rid of this?
See here:
Thanks!
Quote from: davidtlong on September 18, 2013, 09:41:55 PM
Yup a problem and there is good info under there. However, I believe this is on of the issues mentioned on the first post that is difficult to address. I may be wrong but I think this is right.
Quote from: kostasra on September 18, 2013, 05:58:20 PM
Check this!!!
650d doesn't exist from Canon site....
http://www.canon-europe.com/Search/index.aspx
http://www.canon-europe.com/For_Home/Product_Finder/Cameras/Digital_SLR/beginners/index.aspx
Quote from: gotar on September 17, 2013, 11:17:59 PM
Sokoban?
Quote from: Rewind on September 14, 2013, 10:19:45 AM
What? It's already there in cropmarks, PHIPHOTO.BMP and PHIVIDEO.BMP
You can easily flip them around by yourself using any graphics editor.
Quote from: h18r on September 11, 2013, 05:04:36 AM
They are totally different. HDR for not moving subjects and gives you a wider range as ISO is best for moving subjects.
Quote from: benlen on September 09, 2013, 03:27:23 AM
Dsagilles, you are my HERO!
I've been gone from the forum a couple weeks (wow, topic went from 15 pages to 23!) and I haven't got a chance to mess around with Magic Lantern.
You beat me to the test I wanted to do. Amazing that, even when the footage is expanded (and the Canon firmware footage scaled down) and then compressed for Youtube, the RAW video is the clear winner. Incredible. I really need to install this.
Okay guys, this is going to sound like a really dumb question, and some smart person will probably refer me to another topic I theoretically could have searched for, but I'll ask anway...
What is this "dual ISO" everyone keeps talking about? It sounds like it isn't working right now in this build, but people seem to think it is necesssary to RAW video.
I've read of how Magic Lantern allows Canon users to shoot an an ISO of 160, which some folks say is the "native" ISO of the camera or something like that. Is that what "Dual ISO" is?
Thanks guys again.
Quote from: Francis on September 07, 2013, 06:24:15 PM
I'm curious as to why you would want a cr2hdr conversion tool on your tablet. The resulting DNG files still need a good deal of PP to get them to look decently exposed. Then you're going to need Lightroom or GIMP/dcraw or whatever running on your tablet also. You might as well just wait until you are back at your 'editing' computer.
Seems like a waste of time. If you are just wanting a preview, then image review does a pretty decent job of blending the exposures.
Quote from: a1ex on September 07, 2013, 10:12:53 AM
Somebody must spend time to maintain the arm port (which is likely to be quite a bit more than just a straightforward compilation of current sources).
If you are willing to do that, be my guest. I'm curious how fast it can go. Maybe put Ubuntu on the Nexus and run it in console?
Quote from: Audionut on September 07, 2013, 09:45:23 AM
30% single threaded performance increase is decent enough. Make it multi-threaded
ARM is power consumption focused. It's still going to be rather slow.
Quote from: Audionut on September 07, 2013, 04:41:33 AM
The processing time is around 30 seconds on my overclocked 2600k. I dread to think what it would be like on a current android device.
Page created in 0.096 seconds with 15 queries.