Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Yea,
Got 720P
d
.I can get 1280*720 out of my Sandisk UHS1 card, but only at 24fps, thats a big factor, if you are shooting even at 25fps you'll get dropped frames or recording will stop.
I don't know what's the cause.
Maybe it worth trying: Rename MAGIC.CFG on your card, then turn camera off and on.
What are the results?
Ciao, Walter
. What do a I name it as anything?Is the Canon resolution set to 1080p?
all, little help here (baseball talk
dave
.right now I can shoot at 640 because of my card. With the aspect ratio set to 16:9 I should have 640/360. But what I get is 640/258.
This is the same as the 1280 instead of 1280/720 I get 514
1280/514 = 2.49
640/258 = 2.48
so my processed images (for the 640 right now) are elongated.
I would appreciate any ideas on this to help.
Thanks
dave
Walter,
mine says 1280 x 514; seems like none of them have the right ratio setting. < -- update
dave
Resolution: 1280
Aspect ratio: 16:9
-> (1280/16) * 9 = 720
Vertical pixel number is determined via Aspect Ratio and horizontal pixel number.
Ciao
Walter
It doesn't require After Effects to do, just a NLE (Premiere, Final Cut, Avid, Vegas, etc) that you can expand/shrink your footage with. I just find it easier to get most stuff done in AE.
Really? Fantastic, I have a Sandisk Extreme 45 mb/s card!
What I mean david is this: Shooting a 1920x1080p clip with the Canon firmware, then shooting with ML Raw at 720p and in post (After Effects/Premiere) expanding the 720p RAW footage to 1080, or at the very least, slightly larger than 1280x720.
The reasoning is this: there have been many claims from some guys on Youtube shooting with the 650D who are shooting RAW at 720 or less than 720, blowing their footage up in post to 1080, and claiming that because the RAW footage contains so much more data, that even blown up it looks better than the Canon firmware 1080p.
I'm not completely convinced of this until I try it with my own workflow and compare.
I am, of course, intrigued by the possibility! I'm a video student with a limited budget, and at this time can't afford to either upgrade to the Panasonic GH3 or the Canon 5D Mark III (two cameras I really want to get my hands on!)
So I'm looking for any way to increase the sharpness and professionalism of the footage coming out of the 650D.
Spider, are you saying you're getting 1280x720 on a 45 mb/s card with ML? If so, that is fantastic news! I'm hoping soon during my vacation that I can install Magic Lantern on the T4i/fiddle with it, and do a video test I've been requesting from other people (hahaha).
If the t4i/650D can record continuously at 1280x720, as opposed to 1472x616, that would help greatly in my quest.
I'm hoping to film a comparison between:
The Canon H.264 firmware on the 650D at 1080p
ML at the highest resolution that it can support continuously.
And in this test, do a couple different comparisons:
The 1080p Canon footage vs the ML footage at 720p
The 1080p Canon footage vs expanded ML footage to close to 1080p dimensions.
And that way determine whether the RAW video on the 650D is worth the additional time spent on the workflow.
720p24 continuously.
guess the 90 and 95 is over kill right ?
Sandisk extreme 45mb/s
Actually, papkee said that a 45 mb/s card SHOULD be able to record video at 1472x616, which is pretty good all things considered.
From my limited understanding, and I very well could be wrong, I thought that using a 90 mb/s card on the 650D is overkill because the 650D's SD slot can only go so far.
Again, and this is what I've gathered, and I could be wrong again, but it seems like the 650D will most likely never be able to record full 1080p with RAW.
On the 700D and 650D you get pink dots don't you? That's because of the default raw stream (or raw type) from the camera. If you change it to one that doesn't contain any anomalies; for some reason draw (used by software such as RAWTherapee) can't process the dng's correctly causing a green tinge/mesh over the image. To fix this I've created a new RAW2DNG tool using Qt so its multi-platform. Here are some of the features.
- Multi-Threading (Makes use of all your CPU cores)
- Full DNG support (Using Adobes own DNG SDK, this fixes a lot of things like thumbnails and image anomalies)
- Compression (Can use Lossless JPEG for DNG's)
- Save directly to TIF
Ok I will admit my lack of knowledge, but can you explain what this. Sorry to be a pest. Just trying to learm
Yes, this will properly process the DNG's so you don't get that green pattern you see when using RAW_TYPE 14.
Which means there's no need to remove any pink dots since there wont be any and no quality will be lost.
Te molesto , me podes decir si con la ultima versión ML_N_20.08.2013 se te fueron los puntos rosa?. En mi caso solo una anduvo bien y fue una mescla de ellas. Solo para saber si no estoy loco. En cuanto al lo amarrilo o verde es tal cual te dijo Stevenbaril. Saludos.
.Ok thanks will look
He's referring to the text at the bottom of the screen.
Una de 8G 90mbs y otra de 16G 40mbs , al parecer esta limitado por la cámara la velocidad de escritura a 45mbs asi que por mas tarjeta que le pongas con mas velocidad, de eso no pasa. Igual graba muy lindo y los colores me parecen fantásticos teniendo en cuenta que no es una cámara buenísima para grabar en raw ..todo lo maneja la plata.
En mi caso lo mejor que logre a 24fps 1600x900 graba bien continuo y 1728x736 graba mejor pero poco tiempo. Proba a ver si logras algo mejor. SaludosThanks and no problem. What card do you use.?
PD: no uso mas el traductor ..escribe cualquier cosa jajaja.
