Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - hjfilmspeed

#451
Archived porting threads / Re: Canon 5D Mark III
October 16, 2012, 01:17:09 AM
So what does everyone think? Can the 5d3 handle higher resolving video in 1920xwhat ever? Just wondering what everyone thinks. ;D
#452
Archived porting threads / Re: Canon 5D Mark III
October 10, 2012, 02:55:07 PM
even though removing the olpf did help a tiny bit
it still most likely wouldnt resolve 1000 lines like it
it should. again i think its deeper then that
unfortunetly. i also fear that the 5d3 might not
have the power to resolve to much more @ 24p

#453
Archived porting threads / Re: Canon 5D Mark III
October 10, 2012, 01:33:03 PM
"Canon should produce more lines at 85mm f4 comparing to falcon 85mm f1.4. And this is true in photo mode. In video is not. It is opposite."

Canon L lenses are suposed to super sharp but you are comparing a zoom lense with a prime. Prime has less glass then a zoom so it should be sharper depending on the prime lense of course. Im not sure why its the oposit in video mode. Also are all your in camera lense profiles turned off?

I agree the resolution issue kills me especialy after you look at true 1080 or 720. I just did a test between the s2 jpeg and all-i 1920x1080 (i will post soon) and its realy strange what happeneds to the image comparing the video to the still (looks more like sampling methods to me). the difference was huge and I realy dought the olpf could fix this. Go for it and test the lenses but i think its the cameras default video smapling method.
#454
Archived porting threads / Re: Canon 5D Mark III
October 10, 2012, 12:41:51 AM
Well it would be awsome if this could be remedied by ML but dont get your hopes up to high and overlook the other sweet features of ML.
#455
I know it can. Im just excited over this. For 11,000 less il take even 1 minute of uncompressed 422 recordings. While i agree the c300 is amazing and tack sharp, 15,000 is just way to far out of my range. im just a little sad with canon right now.

Its all good either way. You make the best of what you got.
#456
Are there still alot of lock up reports for the 5d3? Or a people figuring out there own user errors ha ha JK! (that will probably be me my first boot)

#457
full hd or 2.35:1 either way it would be a huge step and would most likely resolve way better! I feel like your site would flood with donations and angry c300 owners. or maybe happy ones if they use a 5d3 as a b cam. That would be plain amazing.
#458
High A1ex! I know very little about comp programing/firmware but 422 sounds awsome! This is getting to exciting for me i must ask questions sorry.
Have you experemented with it yet?
How long of a clip could be sustained with a fast card on the 5d3 do u think?
Do you think it will make a difference in sharpness?
Thank you for your time a patients with turkeys like me ha ha
#459
Archived porting threads / Re: Canon 5D Mark III
October 09, 2012, 05:46:39 PM
These tests. If they are true anyways.

http://www.eoshd.com/content/8201/canon-5d-mark-iii-without-optical-low-pass-filter-the-verdict

The results are very minor. There is a way bigger jump comparing the s2 jpeg shot in video mode to the all-i.

I realy think its like a1ex said. The 5d3 rez issue boils down to the downsampling/sensor scanning method and maybe codec. As alex has posted ML cant change the type of codec. He himself was very optimistic in saying that there might be a very very slim chance of mjpeg or realy short 422 clips but again that in itself would be a crazy tuff code to crack.
#460
Archived porting threads / Re: Canon 5D Mark III
October 09, 2012, 03:32:16 PM
from the tests ive seen removing the olpf is not
the answer. if theres proof otherwise i think
the olpf thing was busted.
#461
Archived porting threads / Re: Canon 5D Mark III
October 09, 2012, 01:34:08 PM
hmmmm i dont think its that. Even with the filter 100% removed the 1080 vid is only a slight bit better but not nearly as sharp as the s2 jpeg. its deffinetly canons method of downsampling in vid mode for sure. You never know ML always surprises but this one sounds tricky.
#462
Archived porting threads / Re: Canon 5D Mark III
October 09, 2012, 05:34:03 AM
ugg it just bothers me to see the camera can produce tack sharp 1080 jpegs (processed in camera). i guess it cant do it at 24p for any length of time. I was hoping this could be possible with silent stills but judging by these last few posts i guess not.

to be fair the 5d3 wasnt designed to be a full frame cine camera. it was designed for photos. you want cine from canon you better be ready to pay for it. It would be awsome if canon could make a 16mm version of the c300. then guys like me might be able to afford it (after i sell sum camera stuff ha ha) But ML is for making the most out of these dslrs for cine work thats for sure. love it so much! Thanks again!
#463
uncompressed 422 clips on the 5d3! 30 seconds of that would be awsome never mind 30mins. even if the 1080 quality was as sharp and easy to grade as its s2 jpeg that would be a hudge improvement! Im so pumped for the 5d3 ml! this is great! waaahhhhh hoooooo!
#464
Archived porting threads / Re: Canon 5D Mark III
September 28, 2012, 04:03:02 PM
Im sure this has been discussed and im sory if it sounds like a broken record but im just curious. in any case i cant wait for the ful ml on the 5d3!!! such exciting times! Thank you so much! The HDR LOOKS SO RAD! so awsome!
#465
Archived porting threads / Re: Canon 5D Mark III
September 28, 2012, 04:00:19 PM
Its amazing whats been done so far with ml and the 5diii! excellent work everyone! I believe the potential for the 5d3 is great. my biggest strife with its video is h.264. I was messing with the s2 jpegs, shooting at 6fps the opening the files up as a jpeg sequence in a 24p timeline. if you shoot s2 jpegs in video mode the files are cropped at 1920x1080 and are only  .5 to 1 MB in size and were way sharper. could it be possible to somehow  shoot s2 jpeg sequences at 24p say for maybe shorter period of time? if so the sharpness and quality would be insane. i was using marvels cine and htp (which normaly makes uglys) and the quality was awsome. i dought this is possible but the jpeg downsampling was real sharp and so easy to grade. it would probably call for a data rate around 200mbs. so what if playback isnt there it would be worth the quality. thanks again for all your hard work!
#466
Its amazing whats been done so far with ml and the 5diii! excellent work everyone! I believe the potential for the 5d3 is great. my biggest strife with its video is h.264. I was messing with the s2 jpegs, shooting at 6fps the opening the files up as a jpeg sequence in a 24p timeline. if you shoot s2 jpegs in video mode the files are cropped at 1920x1080 and are only  .5 to 1 MB in size and were way sharper. could it be possible to somehow  shoot s2 jpeg sequences at 24p say for maybe shorter period of time? if so the sharpness and quality would be insane. i was using marvels cine and htp (which normaly makes uglys) and the quality was awsome. i dought this is possible but the jpeg downsampling was real sharp and so easy to grade. it would probably call for a data rate around 200mbs. so what if playback isnt there it would be worth the quality. thanks again for all your hard work!