There are no active developers with the camera, so no.
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Audionut on March 31, 2014, 03:25:08 PM
Between the forums, his paying job, his current development workload, family, and whatever else I don't know about, that seems fairly reasonable to me. *shrugs shoulders*
Quote from: garry23 on March 23, 2014, 03:25:48 PM
May I request that the bars be made a lot 'thicker' or that a big green dot be made to appear in the MZ window when focus is achieved.
Quote from: gary2013 on March 28, 2014, 06:36:43 PMI did. There are features enabled in TL that caused bricks in the past like movie mode remap or assertion patching and that have been removed from ML since for that reason. These make TL more unsafe than vanilla ML as we have documented proof of bad behavior in the past
And you just admitted the same warnings on ML. So, now what is the truthful way to make people not use T_? What about the guy I just mentioned who claims his loyal faith in whatever ML tells him? He based it on what ML said to scare him about being unsafe. You didn't comment on that.
Quote from: gary2013 on March 28, 2014, 06:22:52 PM
ML warns people about using ML at their own risk and possibly bricking a camera. So what is the difference there? A double standard?
Quote from: gary2013 on March 28, 2014, 06:02:23 PM
well, if that is true, then let us talk with 1%. I am concerned that he told me he can now fix the EOSM to have a headphone output. Then all this stuff started here and we can't get what was wanted by many loyal forum users, like myself, who have asked for this and waited patiently.
Page created in 0.145 seconds with 15 queries.