1
Tragic Lantern / Re: Tragic Lantern for 6D
« on: May 15, 2013, 07:12:40 PM »
I missed a bit of discussion. Prompt, Magic Lantern already "learned" to write Jpeg sequence, instead of RAW?
News:
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
Tragic Lantern / Re: Tragic Lantern for 6D
« on: May 03, 2013, 08:35:57 PM »
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.2 x64 (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo
SANDISK ULTRA SDHC CLASS 10 32GB 30MB/SEC UHS-I
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 44.069 MB/s
Sequential Write : 11.137 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 39.031 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 7.748 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 3.368 MB/s [ 822.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 1.158 MB/s [ 282.7 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 3.454 MB/s [ 843.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.641 MB/s [ 156.5 IOPS]
Test : 1000 MB [J: 0.0% (0.0/29.7 GB)] (x5)
Date : 2013/04/13 21:12:51
OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
I bought one such card (and 3 more ordered), tried to record video in ALL-I.ALL-I (normal to the native firmware 1.1.3) recording is not possible, constantly interrupted recording, a buffer overflow. I will return 3 cards ordered.
For comparison with the memory card Transend class 10 (normal, not UHS-I) 16 GB recording speed (Sequential Write) - 13-14 Mb \ s. By the way, the maximum bit rate of some of my files stored in the ALL-I - 95 Mbit / s. If we translate this into megabytes per second - 11,875. That is, card need write speed not less than 12 megabits per second.
CrystalDiskMark 3.0.2 x64 (C) 2007-2013 hiyohiyo
SANDISK ULTRA SDHC CLASS 10 32GB 30MB/SEC UHS-I
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]
Sequential Read : 44.069 MB/s
Sequential Write : 11.137 MB/s
Random Read 512KB : 39.031 MB/s
Random Write 512KB : 7.748 MB/s
Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 3.368 MB/s [ 822.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 1.158 MB/s [ 282.7 IOPS]
Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 3.454 MB/s [ 843.3 IOPS]
Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 0.641 MB/s [ 156.5 IOPS]
Test : 1000 MB [J: 0.0% (0.0/29.7 GB)] (x5)
Date : 2013/04/13 21:12:51
OS : Windows 7 Ultimate Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)
I bought one such card (and 3 more ordered), tried to record video in ALL-I.ALL-I (normal to the native firmware 1.1.3) recording is not possible, constantly interrupted recording, a buffer overflow. I will return 3 cards ordered.
For comparison with the memory card Transend class 10 (normal, not UHS-I) 16 GB recording speed (Sequential Write) - 13-14 Mb \ s. By the way, the maximum bit rate of some of my files stored in the ALL-I - 95 Mbit / s. If we translate this into megabytes per second - 11,875. That is, card need write speed not less than 12 megabits per second.
3
Tragic Lantern / Re: Tragic Lantern for 6D
« on: March 08, 2013, 06:26:59 PM »
maybe this video will answer your question
4
Tragic Lantern / Re: Tragic Lantern for 6D
« on: March 06, 2013, 11:04:18 PM »
Most importantly, this filter - the mechanical implementation of the camera, which prevents its parts. First, it reduces exposure to some level. In their advertising on Vimeo, they refer to the non-permanent cloud of light conditions. However, why the clouds covering the sun is, when there is a filter test, and not without? Secondly, I think the filter to reduce the sharpness.
5
Tragic Lantern / Re: Tragic Lantern for 6D
« on: March 06, 2013, 06:04:37 PM »
Do you think Canon will release the update gets rid of moire in the coming year? I think 6D selling well, and they have yet to release updated lack of motivation to get rid of moire. Even in spite of discontent videographers. Through which all "channels" users should refer to the Canon? Hard to believe that they meticulously study all forums.
6
Tragic Lantern / Re: Tragic Lantern for 6D
« on: March 05, 2013, 07:49:51 PM »
it is vertical banding, is not is?
vertical banding is enhanced when the "priority of lights", and is typical of the lack of ALL Canon FF cameras. CROP on too, but less. I, too, was angry about this, here is my petition:
http://www.change.org/ru/петиции/firmware-correcting-the-defect-vertical-banding-canon-5d-mark-2-in-videorecord
I wrote about this in the Russian representative Canon, they was told that would deal with the issue, but that this effect is a design feature of the Canon cameras.
Once you talk about it, I suggest that the joint efforts to seek solutions to problems Canon vertical banding. Like I said - this is not an isolated incident, and not a single marriage - vertical banding appears on all 5d Mark 2 that I tested (5-6), many other owners have reported this problem. On 5d Mark 3, which I held in my hands also observed vertical banding. At 6d, at first glance, the vertical banding is less visible than 5d Mark 2.
Magic Lantern team may be able to do something about it.
vertical banding is enhanced when the "priority of lights", and is typical of the lack of ALL Canon FF cameras. CROP on too, but less. I, too, was angry about this, here is my petition:
http://www.change.org/ru/петиции/firmware-correcting-the-defect-vertical-banding-canon-5d-mark-2-in-videorecord
I wrote about this in the Russian representative Canon, they was told that would deal with the issue, but that this effect is a design feature of the Canon cameras.
Once you talk about it, I suggest that the joint efforts to seek solutions to problems Canon vertical banding. Like I said - this is not an isolated incident, and not a single marriage - vertical banding appears on all 5d Mark 2 that I tested (5-6), many other owners have reported this problem. On 5d Mark 3, which I held in my hands also observed vertical banding. At 6d, at first glance, the vertical banding is less visible than 5d Mark 2.
Magic Lantern team may be able to do something about it.
7
Tragic Lantern / Re: Tragic Lantern for 6D
« on: March 05, 2013, 04:18:52 PM »
Earlier, in another thread, I wrote and received the reply:
Is it possible to implement this function in 6D or he, too hardware limitation?
Is it possible to make a setting "Audio" in the section "Input Source", reversed L: int R: ext, so that a record was with L: ext (external) and R: int (internal)? Is it possible to implement a new version of the firmware? If not why? The fact that I have an external microphone, which provides mono sound on the right to the left channel.
On AK4646 cameras it's not possible, it's a hardware limitation.
What about L to L external. R to internal? R could be broken or not exist.
Is it possible to implement this function in 6D or he, too hardware limitation?
8
Feature Requests / ML on EOS 6D and 60 fps on Digic 5
« on: February 06, 2013, 02:03:34 AM »
Hi! Do you plan on ML EOS 6D? If yes, when, it is possible to wait around? The attached subject says that 60 frames per second at 1080p can not be achieved, however, is on the Digic 4, but what about the Digic 5? You guys, your team just talent and doing an amazing job helping me (and others) want to work and perfect. 60 frames per second, one of the most anticipated things, if this can be achieved at 6d or 5d Mark 3, I think the ranks of users ML increase tenfold. Once again thank you for the excellent work!
9
Feature Requests / Re: Features on the TODO list - things that ARE possible
« on: September 23, 2012, 04:59:12 PM »
* Very short uncompressed 422 video clips YUV 4:2:2 recorded 1-2 seconds due to the very high bit rate, ie limited by the speed cards? Ie If you can achieve compression clips will be longer? Or is it due to the computational speed of the processor, memory, and so on? I understand that the function itself is only "in the future", but it's such great news!
10
General Help Q&A / Re: L: ext (external) and R: int (internal)
« on: September 10, 2012, 07:41:13 PM »I'm 600D audio developing now.
Maybe I can do this request (I'm not checked another cameras, Because chip-set is different).
BTW, You can do this request on post processing. Why you need to this on camera?
This type of audio recording is very useful when you need a "duplicate record" audio. Along with the external and internal microphone. I am very grateful to the developers for this feature. At the post-production sound can not pull out of the channel, which is written empty. I mean, the cases need to hedge, using the internal microphone of the camera, suddenly the battery from an external microphone or sit wire will act up. If at this point it records via the function of the external microphone, no post-production does not help, just the sound will not be recorded.
11
General Help Q&A / L: ext (external) and R: int (internal)
« on: September 10, 2012, 01:40:46 AM »
Is it possible to make a setting "Audio" in the section "Input Source", reversed L: int R: ext, so that a record was with L: ext (external) and R: int (internal)? Is it possible to implement a new version of the firmware? If not why? The fact that I have an external microphone, which provides mono sound on the right to the left channel.
12
General Help Q&A / Re: cleaner shadows, smoother highlight rolloff, and cleaner ISOs
« on: July 24, 2012, 12:52:32 AM »
Thanks! Does on the improved features "cleaner shadows, smoother highlight rolloff, and cleaner ISOs" value of ML digital ISO? For example, the value of -0.2 is better than -0.1? Or simply put a negative value to -0.1, and value less than it simply changes the exposure (making the image darker)?
13
General Help Q&A / cleaner shadows, smoother highlight rolloff, and cleaner ISOs
« on: July 23, 2012, 11:11:30 PM »
Whether correctly I understand, that for switching on of this improving (cleaner shadows, smoother highlight rolloff, and cleaner ISOs) it is enough to only install Magic Lantern? Or need to include something "special" in the settings?
14
General Help Q&A / Re: hide the indicator
« on: July 15, 2012, 06:20:23 PM »
Thanks. Everything turned out. A charge of what this indicator is whether it is memory and CPU time? Changing the screen layout off or just hiding it?
15
General Help Q&A / hide the indicator
« on: July 15, 2012, 03:55:14 PM »
Hi, how to hide the indicator marked with red arrows?
16
Feature Requests / Re: Camera start in LiveView mode
« on: July 12, 2012, 03:55:00 AM »On 5D Mark II and in movie mode, yes.Tell me how to do it on the 5D Mark II? In the 550D camera in movie mode immediately incorporated into the video capture mode (LiveView), and 5D Mark II, even with the setting ML "Force LiveView" is included in the first mode, exposure settings for the photo, then switch to LiveView. Is it possible to automatically, without delay, power-5D Mark II camera just to get LiveView? Thanks in advance.
Pages: [1]