In your opinion, trolls are all Canon customers who want a 2000€ for good camera for 2017 and not a huge flop that has performance as 4-5 year old cameras, while in competition, man has the same money equipments corresponding to 2017? Why the basic ASPC Nikon DSLR camera have much more dynamic range than the Canon 6D Mark II FF for 2000 € in 2017?
Whether I ask - according to Canon, landscape photographer uses ISO 320 24/7 to achieve the desired dynamic range as a competitor (SONY / NIKON / FUJI / PENTAX ...) with ISO 100?. Think about that...
I wanted to invest in Canon 6D Mark II as a transition to FF, but with such parameters and that landscape photographers take ISO 320 on the day to achieve a good dynamic range - it's a tragedy.
Whether I ask - according to Canon, landscape photographer uses ISO 320 24/7 to achieve the desired dynamic range as a competitor (SONY / NIKON / FUJI / PENTAX ...) with ISO 100?. Think about that...
I wanted to invest in Canon 6D Mark II as a transition to FF, but with such parameters and that landscape photographers take ISO 320 on the day to achieve a good dynamic range - it's a tragedy.