Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - janjan

#1
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 70D
March 01, 2021, 10:41:06 AM
Quote from: a1ex on February 27, 2021, 09:43:55 PM
I've enabled it 3 years ago.

To date, I haven't received any confirmation on whether it works or not, except for your message. Mind providing some more details? I don't own this camera, and QEMU doesn't emulate this functionality, so I cannot check it myself.

I've checked it and it appear to work as expected.
I defined the start end/point using the built in option.
Set the required steps behind and in front it was taking image and moving the focus as expected.


#2
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 70D
February 27, 2021, 09:57:51 PM
I'll make some more thorough test in the following days and report back...
I only checked it briefly today with the latest experimental build and it was working.
#3
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 70D
February 27, 2021, 08:43:15 PM
Thanks
Found it and I realized that stack focus is now working.
Has this been implemented a while ago?
Last time I checked , which was quite some time ago, it wasn't.
#4
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 70D
February 27, 2021, 07:50:47 PM
Hi,
Are the nightly builds still updated? the last one if from 2018.
Is there a newer version.

Thanks,

#5
Hi,
thanks for all the hard work.
Any idea if the disabled focus menus, which enable focus staking, will every be fixed?

#6
Hi,
Is focus Stacking still disabled in the latest Ml release for the 70D?
#7
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 7D Mark II
March 02, 2016, 09:48:30 AM
Hey, no need to get mad.

We all love ML and all we try to do is get some hope regarding the continuation of this great project.



#8
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 7D Mark II
March 02, 2016, 09:26:20 AM
I understand all this but it does not change the situation.
No dev will take this job because it takes a LOT of time and, sorry to write this again, but time = money.
No new cameras will ever be supported by ML (probably) which will eventually kill the project.
Can we agree on this?

I am not here to convince anyone to do anything he or she does not wish to, especially not on their free time.

Asking people to learn code and reverse engineer Canon code is an option but a very unlikely one.
The tools and the code here cannot be use for the new processor else they would have been already used.

Can you offer any solution to stop the (slow) death of this project?

#9
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 7D Mark II
March 02, 2016, 08:14:47 AM
Don't get me wrong!
I don't argue with any dev. It's their choice and we can only thank them for the work they've done so far, and for FREE!!!

I am saying, that if this project is due to die, which is the only conclusion possible since no one will continue developing it, then it does not leave too many options.
Canon will never do this! it's against their interest. They DO NOT want to sell you a chip camera with the power of an expensive one.
Of course they can but this is all about marketing and money. They disable some code in the cheaper models or not bother developing it on purpose.

People here are not trying to ruin your ideology.
What people are saying here is that if no one is willing to develop new code, they are willing to pay for it.


#10
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 7D Mark II
March 02, 2016, 07:47:38 AM
Quote from: cmccullum on March 01, 2016, 09:24:39 PM
You CAN invest the time. If it is important enough to you, you can sacrifice other things, and spend time to learn how to code and port to new cameras. It simply isn't worth it to you. Maybe the devs just don't WANT to work on the new cameras. To me, that's a perfectly valid reason for them not doing so, and everyone who isn't willing to help should stop trying to convince them to give MORE.

I am EE engineer and telling someone to learn code is like telling you to design a computer chip - it is not that easy!
I totally agree it takes time and time=money, is it not so?
I don't expect anyone to invest that much time on trying to decode the digic6 and rewrite the code and as we all agree, no one is doing it right now and probably will never do.
So I still think the only option to "convince" someone to do it is by giving him/her an incentive.
And the donations people argued for and against here, is one kind of an incentive.


#11
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 7D Mark II
March 01, 2016, 02:49:07 PM
However, as pointed out by you, no ML is available for any of the new camera models with the new processor.
This will also kill the project eventually.
#12
thank you.
do you think focus stacking will be implemented one day?
#13
Hi,
After realizing there will not be any ML for 7D MK II in the near future I am turning to 70D.
Could anyone confirm the following feature, for photography, not video, work in the 70D ML:

Intervalometer
Focus stacking
HDR bracketing
Dual ISO
Auto exposure
ETTR
BULB timer


Thanks
#14
Hi,
After realizing there will not be any ML for 7D MK II in the near future I am turning to 70D.
Could anyone confirm the following feature, for photography, work in the 70D ML:

Intervalometer
Focus stacking
HDR bracketing
Dual ISO
Auto exposure
ETTR
BULB timer



Thanks
#15
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 7D Mark II
February 25, 2016, 11:23:15 AM
Ok,
Is there anyone working on developing ML for ANY new camera today or no one?
#16
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 7D Mark II
February 25, 2016, 10:15:51 AM
I agree, programming a camera would take a lot of effort and reverse engineering makes it even harder.

Still, if no one it pumping new blood (Canon models) to the system, this great project will eventually die, it that not so?
After all, the older models will not be here forever.
#17
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 7D Mark II
February 25, 2016, 07:52:34 AM
I only use it for photography and it presents great improvements.

So the bottom line is that it will not be available for Canon 7D MK II, am I correct?
#18
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 7D Mark II
February 24, 2016, 04:24:50 PM
I currently have the T3i which has ML support.
It adds so much more that I'll think twice before buying a new camera which has NO ML support.
Not all new canon models have ML support, hence my comment.
#19
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 7D Mark II
February 24, 2016, 04:06:17 PM
Meaning non Canon which would require replacing all my other gear as well - lenses and flashes - a VERY expensive choice.
I think I'll stick with my T3i for now.

Do you think there is any development taking place concerning support of Ml in new models or only nightly builds?

Thanks anyway,

#20
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 7D Mark II
February 24, 2016, 10:32:20 AM
Hi,
Am I correct to assume there are no current plans and no current work for Magic lantern to 7D MK II?
I am considering purchasing the 7D MK II and ML is a crucial consideration for me.
#21
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 600D / T3i
December 21, 2015, 07:35:17 PM
Thank you all.
If there are no new stuff then i shall stick with the current version.

Do you believe that is there will be new stuff it will be available for the T3i as well?
#22
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 600D / T3i
December 14, 2015, 09:00:11 PM
hi
are there any updates planned for the 600D?
I saw that for other models the nightly builds are all recent and for the the T3i they are quite old.

any idea if new updates are planned?
#23
Hi,
Is it possible to set limits for the max/min values of ISO/Av/Tv?
E.g. say i am in Av mode, and I want to restrict my camera not to use shutter speed lower, or higher than a specific value.
Or I use Av mode and I do not want to go below F5.6 (if i do need to the camera will raise ISO)
On my camera (600D) I can only limit the max ISO to be used but the way to select this is not so convenient.
#24
Hi,
Would it be possible to save several user presets? (I have 600D)
Let say that I set up various factors, e.g. ext. flash settings, WB, Image mode etc, and want to save these settings for different scenarios.
Will it be possible to add an option to save all/some settings as presets to be loaded instead of changing them manually each time?
If yes will this be possible only for ML feature or for the other features, e.g. ext. flash settings?
If this is only possible for ML feature then perhaps it would be possible to simply (if it is really simple...) save different config files and load them like user presets.
#25
General Help Q&A / How to use expo. presets
January 15, 2015, 09:17:57 AM
Hi,
Can anyone please explain, in detail how to use the expo. presets feature?
How to save an exposure preset? what value are saved and is there a way to view them?
how to restore a preset?
does the camera need to be in a specific mode for that?

Thank you

I know this has been asked before but never answered...