Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - JosiahDuncan

#1
Quote from: reddeercity on March 23, 2014, 12:39:45 AM
I push it at 2048x1024 and can get about 2000+ frames. But I think when I change from small jPeg photo in
the Canon menu to small raw that's when I Notice a Big difference in performance. I would say 15-20% even to be the
difference between continuous and Not.
With the Oct24th build of course

Are the Lexar Cards really that magic or am I doing something wrong? I got a little excited and tried to test things out again but can't get anywhere near those speeds, i have to step down to 1728x972 to shoot continuous 16:9 on a Transcend 32gb 1000x. Or instead I shoot 1880x800 anamorphic and upscale to 1920x816 for 2.35. Last summer I assumed Transcend had really good build quality, but does the brand of the card make that much of a difference?
Tried on both Oct24th Build and the Newest Build
#2
Awesome thanks, thought 1880 was gone
#3
Wow, finally getting to post here about the first project I've done that was %100 raw video using an old build from a few months ago! Loving all the fantastic free progress, it's like I have a whole new camera! Did this a few months back but it's finally going to be released soon, I suppose it's time to upgrade my ML version.

I used a build before the audio was added, shot in 1880 x 800, graded through davinci resolve. Hmm, it seems the biggest changes are the addition of audio and getting rid of 1880 mode? Is this true?