I'm still hoping very much for 100D support!
I would have no problem paying quite a bit for ML as a product if that would result in quicker turnarounds in creating builds for new camera models.
When comparing cost/weight/ease of use with other alternatives for doing HDR images (i.e. 360 panoramas for VFX and CG) I feel that there is quite a big margin for motivating a price for the ML software.
However perhaps there would be legal/moral issues with Canon if it is packaged as a commercial product with a price tag?..
I would have no problem paying quite a bit for ML as a product if that would result in quicker turnarounds in creating builds for new camera models.
When comparing cost/weight/ease of use with other alternatives for doing HDR images (i.e. 360 panoramas for VFX and CG) I feel that there is quite a big margin for motivating a price for the ML software.
However perhaps there would be legal/moral issues with Canon if it is packaged as a commercial product with a price tag?..