I did the test and modules tab didn't disappear. Couldn't reproduce the bug.
Cam: 550D
ML: Nightly.2018.Jul03.550D109
SD: 64GB ExFAT formatted SD card.
Cam: 550D
ML: Nightly.2018.Jul03.550D109
SD: 64GB ExFAT formatted SD card.
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Kharak on July 12, 2014, 11:04:11 PM
To your second part, I am not sure if it is using preview files or Rendered files, I was assuming it was using the DNxHD files. How can I tell?
Quote from: Kharak on July 11, 2014, 08:50:31 PM
The DNxHD file is 1920x1080 cause thats the only resolution you can render out from the AVID DNxHD Codec (free one that is), the RAW footage is 1920x872 so it is stretched when looking at the DNxHD file and I have to put in 2:20.1 aspect ratio in order to watch it properly in my player. I wrote in an earlier post 1920x1080, that was not true I meant to write that it was not upscaled or anything, but the PP project is 1920x872 and is rendered out the same and is perfect in premiere. I suppose it is actually "upscaled" because it is stretched vertically.
So I am suspecting that PP has a problem with this 2:20.1 aspect ratio that is stretched to 1920x1080 and then re-squeezed ?
Quote from: Filmmaking_Dude on July 11, 2014, 06:32:03 PM
You are not using the render files on export?
Quote from: SDX on September 03, 2013, 08:44:14 PMWell now it logged in fine.
That's strange - it should only say #magiclantern, without the # at the end. It does work for me, so are you sure you didn't enter the last # by fault?
Quote from: ru31jan on September 02, 2013, 11:30:45 PMWell my dear friend mister director wanted to get the most out of this camera and insisted we shoot it this way. And truly this was a test project to the extent that we were testing out RAW and what's the most we can get out of the 50D.
I was just wondering: why would you go through all this trouble with cropping? Is it just the extra pixels? Because I've seen some stuff from the 50D without cropping that looked razorsharp too, definitly for YT and Vimeo use.
Quote from: dariSSight on September 02, 2013, 06:54:42 PMI would have to review after each shot with that B&W 6fps distorted playback. And yes it does crop in considerably, so distance was required for each shot. You kind of get used to the faming and I did some test before the actual production to see where the framing would land. It was a lot of the time great guesswork and sometimes luck. In order to get the right framing I would guess where the frame should be, do a 2 second shot, play it back, move the camera, shoot a 2 sec shot, etc. until you get the good framing. Also I would switch the crop around, if he is on the right side of the frame I would keep the crop in the center so the right edge of what you're seeing is the right edge of the frame, if he is on the left side I would notch it to the right 1 notch so the left edge of what you're seeing is the left edge. Complicated stuff. We would do many takes for each shot to get them right.
Great Kick Ass Filmmaking , I'm very confuse how you were able to see you shots correctly. When you use 5x crop(ML 3x) does it zoom in so close that you would have to back up an extreme amount that it would be difficult to film your subject without distance?
Page created in 0.094 seconds with 13 queries.