Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Cranston P.K. Tewksbery

#1
General Help Q&A / Re: ML for Dummies
August 09, 2013, 05:08:20 PM
Thank you Walter.  This is very helpful and makes sense.

All the best,

C.P.K.T
#2
General Help Q&A / Re: ML for Dummies
August 09, 2013, 04:16:56 PM
Hi Walter,

Thanks for your response--extremely helpful.  The table is brilliant.  So it is possible to format without removing ML. 

One other bit of clarification needed, please correct me if I'm wrong here:

Based on your response, I assume that part of what happens during the initial installation of ML is that the camera's "bootflag" is activated.  So I take it what is meant by "removing" ML from the "camera", is simply the act of "deactivating" the camera's bootflag?

Lastly, you say:

Quote from: Walter Schulz on August 09, 2013, 06:30:58 AM
A camera with bootflag set will look for a *bootable* card with ML (directory, files) on it.

Are all CF cards bootable by default?  Or are they made to be bootable by ML during the initial card installation or by virtue of having the ML files on it?  This relates to my question about using a non-ML card (one that has never had ML on it).  If CF cards are bootable by default, then this would mean the camera will stall if the camera's bootflag is still set when used with a non-ML card.

Thanks in advance for your help.
#3
General Help Q&A / Re: ML for Dummies
August 09, 2013, 04:11:27 AM
Quote from: Cranston P.K. Tewksbery on August 09, 2013, 04:01:01 AM

Lastly, my workflow protocol is such that I format my cards every time they go out.  This means I am wiping the ML firmware from the card at the same time and would then need to reload it.


Just to clarify this quote, I am not re-installing the ML firmware to the camera, rather I am simply saving the firmware back to the card from a folder I have saved on my computer hard drive.  This, after the initial installation process.  Essentially the camera sees the same thing
#4
General Help Q&A / ML for Dummies
August 09, 2013, 04:01:01 AM
I am somewhat technically challenged and was wondering if someone might offer a dumbed-down explanation of how ML plays with Canon's firmware.  I have two 7Ds and decided to dedicate one to run ML experimentally (I have no intention of using it in production for the time being).  Following the instructions on ML's site, I loaded it yesterday and it appears to be running fine.  The features are nothing short of mind blowing, needless to say. 

When reviewing some of ML's documents, I see there is a explanation of how to REMOVE ML from a "CARD", as well as how to REMOVE it from a "CAMERA".  This is where I get lost.  My understanding is that ML is pulled from the card (connected each time through Canon's Firmware update menu item), which is why it resides there, yet there is documentation on how to remove it from the camera? 

This raises a couple of issues.  Can I use the same camera WITHOUT an ML card--running it solely in Canon's environment--with the same confidence as I would any non-ML Canon camera in a production environment, or would I need to "remove" ML from the "camera" all together?  And what is it exactly that is "removed from the camera"? In looking at the forums, I see terms like "boot-strap" and "boot flag" bandied about and wonder if this is what I am missing--an understanding of the terminology.

Lastly, my workflow protocol is such that I format my cards every time they go out.  This means I am wiping the ML firmware from the card at the same time and would then need to reload it.  I've already done this several times without problems, but I am wondering--based on your experience--if this is advisable or potentially problematic?  Formatting one's card each time is a precautionary measure used to reduce the potential for data corruption and very commonly used in the still photography community.  Don't know if this is something recommended among digital SLR  film makers, but I would like to continue to use this method in my own workflow.

That's it for now.

Thanks in advance for your help.