Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - lionelp

#1
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 50D
July 25, 2014, 06:29:41 PM
Quote from: villasmanzanillo on July 23, 2014, 11:31:05 PM
@EVZML

Thanks.
This videos im making are not for the people of vimeo and movie gurus etc, this videos are more for people that want to go to the beach and see a happy colours and vibrancy, thats what im trying to achieve. this is what i would like my videos to look like http://www.flykam.com.au/real-estate-videos-tours/2-tully-court-kuranda-vanessa-robinson-lj-hooker/  if you have any suggestions in how to achieve those looks its greatly appreciated. all the corrections im doing are in resolve and im new at it.

Looks good to me! :)
#2
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 50D
May 29, 2014, 05:53:55 PM
@ ikola 1: Nice work!
#3
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
April 22, 2014, 04:57:57 PM
Quote from: oneclassym8 on April 19, 2014, 07:37:43 AM

Did a little experimenting with the .mlv record. The above video is a combination of 1080p 24p h.264 and 1280 x 720 (16:9) 23.976 .mlv.
Converted the .mlv to DNGs in MLVMystique imported DNGs into Lightroom5 and processed with the help of VSCO Film presets. Imported processed DNGs into AE upscaled to 1080p, then cut and transitioned in Premiere Pro.
Canon 60d, Canon 35mm f2, Canon 50mm f1.8 (both shot wide open), Sandisk Extreme 30mb/sec, and VariND filter. Didn't have a monopod/tripod/washer and string with me at the time so the movements are crap.


Nice footage. Good integration of raw and H.264 .
#4
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 50D
April 22, 2014, 04:50:18 PM
Quote from: sync24fps on April 22, 2014, 09:37:35 AM

That said, for now, my 50D remain a "B" camera for night time exterior establishing shots (and WOW is it great in low light).  But for main "A" camera shooting, I'll be going with the 7D or 5D mkii for the next RAW production.   Hopefully these will not overheat as the 50D does.

Nice post.
I would definitely agree there are newer cameras that are less prone to overheating issues.  But what a nice image.
#5
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 50D
April 18, 2014, 04:38:11 AM
@LEVISDAVIS:
:)
#6
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
April 16, 2014, 05:15:47 PM
Quote from: bennyray1 on April 15, 2014, 04:16:14 AM


so I put together this little project to test the new Cinelog Log Lut for Davinci and see if created a easier workflow for my system.I am very happy with the results, and the proxies where rendered very quickly and worked great in Premiere.

here is a quick run down of what I did just in case any one was interested, I am still new at using this workflow so I am sure I could have done tons of things differently..plus the surf was super fun so I did not film to much.

Filmed with 60D with the help of Magic Lantern MLV_REC...converted to LOG with Cinelog newest Davinci LUT and color corrected also in Davinci...then to Premiere..color graded Osiris M31 Lut....

Looks good! Raw handles the sun well!
#7
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
April 16, 2014, 05:13:18 PM
Quote from: filmcubepro on April 13, 2014, 04:56:30 AM
heres a short filmed using magic lantern's raw function :)
everything was filmed at 24 fps, 1152x524 resolution
its was then up-resed to 1920x ???  ( i kept the same aspect ratio)
make sure to watch in 1080p :)


Like it! Looks good!
#8
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 50D
April 16, 2014, 04:04:36 PM
Quote from: LEVISDAVIS on April 16, 2014, 01:20:07 PM

Anyway, the 50D seems to be perfectly aged for recording .RAW. It's not too clean, not too dirty, plenty of detail, and blows up to 4K 4.2.0 no problem.

Definitely agree and particularly the not too clean not too dirty part! Love that about the 50D
Question about the 4.2.0 blowup to 4K. Why 4.2.0? Not 100% sure why. Is it pure resolution numbers, ie 1586 x 1080 1054 (or so) ?...or 1920 x 1080 or so in crop mode? ??? Not quite sure.

Thanks.
#9
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
April 11, 2014, 02:07:16 PM
Bioskop.Inc said: "Still would like the TL version..."

Agreed but the ML version is infinitely better than Canon h.264 out of the box.  :)
#10
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
April 11, 2014, 01:42:01 AM
" Depending on the scene. That was the last setting on the camera. Pointing out towards a Cityscape gettiing 60 to plus 70 mbs."


Now adjusting things a little: 
CBR 2.2 Q Scale -16 ISO 400 getting Plus 90 mbs but below 100 for the scene that I tested.
#11
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
April 11, 2014, 01:32:17 AM
Quote from: Bioskop.Inc on April 10, 2014, 12:59:20 PM
Do you mean using using VBR (Q-Scale) instead of CBR or just CBR ramped up to 3.0x?

CBR 1.8,  Q Scale -14

Edit: Depending on the scene. That was the last setting on the camera. Pointing out towards a Cityscape gettiing 60 to plus 70 mbs.
#12
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
April 09, 2014, 01:11:18 PM
@Bioskop.Inc
"Yeah I would love the GOP Slice bit rate hack for the 60D..."

So would I, but have you tried adjusting the bit rate on the 60D as per the Gop Slice specs?
I have and I have gotten pretty high bit rates (plus 100Mbs) and decent h.264 video as a result.
Edit: you can't use sound (on camera) though with the higher Mbs rates.
#13
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 50D
April 04, 2014, 03:51:15 PM
Quote from: ninurta on April 04, 2014, 02:20:47 PM
As i understood, i will not be able to see the real angle of view in crop mode?
Well.. not quite...you will see part of what ( a large percentage of what) you are filming in the viewfinder but the area that you are filming/ recording will be somewhat greater than the area that you are seeing in your viewfinder. Particularly width wise.
Similar to a lot of film cameras that would give you about 90-99% of your picture in the viewfinder. In other words; in crop mode the area that you are filming is slightly greater than what you see in the viewfinder
#14
Quote from: Audionut on March 29, 2014, 06:00:47 PM
1% has not been banned.

Quote from: nanomad on March 29, 2014, 05:49:17 PM
1% is still contributing to the project. Technically speaking he's contributing more now than he was before. It may not look like that from a user perspective but he is.




Thank you Audionut and nanomad for clarifying this.
Even though it hurt a little from my point of view; a unified group is certainly capable of excellent future development than  as opposed to a group that is separated and not unified.
#15
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 50D
March 27, 2014, 09:35:03 PM
Quote from: zenclimber on March 27, 2014, 05:43:34 PM
i own a 60D and 5Diii. Unfortunately the 60D's RAW capabilities are not that good due to slow SD card writing.

Just as an opinion, would you suggest getting a 50D as a "cheap" RAW B-roll camera as company for my 5D as the main camera? Of course, cheap is relative  :). Since i don't own a 50D yet, do the two combine good together, feature wise?

I love the 50D. Non crop max resolution is: 1584 X 1058 continuous and in crop 2000(1920) x[1080  2:1/ 980 continuous . If that works for you go for it.
The footage graded and with a LUT reminds me of super 16mm footage. I wouldn't consider the footage from the 50D quite as perfected as the footage from the 5Diii. But everyone has a different opinion.
#16
Tragic Lantern / Re: 50D Raw video
March 26, 2014, 06:19:32 PM
Quote from: far.in.out on March 26, 2014, 12:17:57 AM
OK. So I got myself a 50D.
What is the optimal build currently? Link

Most current is usually optimal:

http://builds.magiclantern.fm/#/     

or TL

https://bitbucket.org/andy600/tl50d/downloads/Tragic_Lantern_for_50D_Andy600Build.2014Mar03.50D109.zip

The warnings posted elsewhere on this thread apply.
#17
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
March 26, 2014, 03:05:37 AM
Quote from: keikun007 on March 26, 2014, 02:55:40 AM
if i were you i would use 1280 in 4:3
when upscaled it will give you 1980x960!
and i believe you'll get much more than 6 seconds in this resolution
Agreed. You have to try different aspect ratios and resolutions and see what works best with your equipment and what appeals most to you.
#18
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
March 25, 2014, 03:22:21 PM
Quote from: dustydelux on March 25, 2014, 12:01:04 AM
I am new to RAW shooting I have the 60d I am wondering where to find the most up to date RAW files are!I would love to give this a shot, I already have the stable 2.3 release.

dustydelux you can get it here:

http://builds.magiclantern.fm/#/
#19
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
March 24, 2014, 04:18:10 PM
Quote from: PaulC on March 24, 2014, 04:04:24 PM
Hey guys,

I recently shot a bit of RAW using the .mlv file type. I've tried looking for info on a workflow to process the .mlv but can't seem to find anything on it. Could any kind person link me to somewhere that I could find this?

Cheers.

Try the link below for one possible method:

http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=10466.0

#20
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
March 23, 2014, 06:37:18 PM
I would set aspect ratio to 2:39 or 4:3 and probably start with 1560 x or something like that. Don't have my camera with me.

#21
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
March 23, 2014, 01:11:40 PM
comurit: you can dial in a slightly lower resolution . The anamorphic lens will stretch your footage into a larger resolution. This will give you more than 6 seconds Try it. The stretch in lower resolutions is one of the benefits of anamorphic.
#22
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
March 23, 2014, 03:11:15 AM
comurit: Nice. What resolution did you use?
#23
Don't know how many people here have seen this, pretty good work by kahL :

http://kahlworks.wordpress.com/2014/02/25/unscientific-yet-fun-50d-and-60d-raw-comparisons/


:)
#24
Tragic Lantern / Re: 50D Raw video
March 11, 2014, 02:30:44 PM
Nice work. What resolution did you use ?
#25
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
March 06, 2014, 01:23:57 PM
roshawn: You're welcome, Marsu42 explained it imo perfectly. It is also a lesson in filmmaking in the video age; to me for sure. You don't need long bits of footage to make a film that works.