Messages

_MG_2317-2324 by Virindi7751, on Flickr

_MG_2381 by Virindi7751, on Flickr

_MG_2360-2368 by Virindi7751, on Flickr

_MG_2499-2505 by Virindi7751, on Flickr

Really cool pics and places!

That's where you want to go if you ever visit France, Paris is overrated.

Thanks !! I think Virindi is a neighbour... south of France 

Région Parisienne, juste de passage dans le 83 en déplacement.

More dual ISO.

_MG_1655 by Virindi7751, on Flickr

_MG_1560-1570 by Virindi7751, on Flickr

_MG_1448-1457 by Virindi7751, on Flickr

_MG_1473 by Virindi7751, on Flickr

I use dual ISO more and more, I love DR. So much that I'm considering switching to the Nikon D810 if Canon's coming technology still show crappy DR.

Panorama1315-1319 by Virindi7751, on Flickr

On this panorama taken at the same time, I forgot to adjust color temperature for each DNG and I thought it looked pretty cool:
Panorama1328-1338 by Virindi7751, on Flickr

My full dual ISO album here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/96833549@N08/sets/72157645918993569/

A little too extreme I think..

I guess that's probably close enough of what I expect of this function dmilligan, at least in daylight for general use.

In a perfect world, there would not be any ISO setting, only shutter speed and aperture.

  I don't understand your technical talk about modules.

In all the tests I made in dual ISO mode against normal ISO, I always prefered the dual ISO file, I'm not sure about the color fidelity loss etc.. on my 6D, the general image quality feels really better, like there is more depth not only in DR but also for micro-contrast and color adjustements.
That's why I dream of a way to be able to use it 100% of the time in evaluative metering and M mode. I can live with the little aliasing and the resolution loss.

The idea is to add a decent amount of DR for any quick every day photo, without thinking of how to set the dual ISO.
Are you sure dual ISO works best with ISO 100 at the base?
If the light isn't extreme I can certainly think of many situations where a good dual ISO 400/1600 photo is better than a single ISO 800 shot maybe? (I don't know)
And that, just shooting without thinking.

Hi.
I like using dual ISO, and I like using auto ISO. Would it be possible to combine the 2 with something like this:
If auto ISO says 400 ISO, have a setting in the module module to use a dual ISO with values of -1 and +1: the shot is a dual ISO 200/800; with -2 +2 the shot would be 100/1600 or 100/800 if at -2 +1...

Of course the result would not be as optimal as with ETTR and setting all that manually, but it's just faster and still better than a normal shot.
Does that make sense? Is it stupid?

Is there any way to know what is new in the latest versions...?
I think I have the one from november 30 installed. 

Yes I know that.
But in HDR video mode, it switches between both every 5 seconds or so, showing you what details you get from the second ISO in the shadows. I like that, don't you?
It's ok if you don't.. 

Hi.
Sorry if it's a stupid idea. I like how in HDR video mode, the liveview switches the exposure simulation between the 2 ISO selected for HDR.
Would it be possible to have the same in dual iso, to give you an idea of what you are recovering in the shadows?

Hi guys, a few I did on my 6D, I love it:

Yep I just found that: "disable all modules". It's ON by default.
I haven't updated for like 2 months, lot of changes in the menus. 
Thanks

Hi. I updated to the last version and the modules won't load. I select them and it says that they will load during next boot but it doesn't happen.
Any ideas? Thanks

I did a quick test:
I shot 8 photos with alternate frames ON, prefix name ON. 1 3 5 7 and 8 turned out dual iso in exposure. 8 should have been normal.
For prefix: 1 3 5 8 named dual. 7 missing prefix

Dual ISO have some problems on my 6D, when I select alternate normal and dual iso photo. Sometimes I get 2 or 3 or 4 normal photos, then one dual; or sometimes the opposite.
The name of the files captured in dual iso is also not accurate, normal photos named dual or the opposite. doesn't seem to be related to the issue I described before..
Finally, on rare occasions, the WB recorded on normal photos (still with alternate function) is really high for no reason. Not a problem since it's raw, just looks weird when you open a series of photos.

Just tested dual iso. That's fantastic! Thanks!
I got a few crashes after taking some photos, if you guys have any clue.

So here is my test of a fake an "instant" HDR photo using 2 RAW HDR video frames at maximum resolution and FPS. iso 100 / 1600
Handheld with a 100mm lens.

You can already do that with photo HDR or video HDR. Dual ISO is I think 2 isos in 1 exposure.

Yes of course, but I mean a real HDR photo it's not as quick as 2 captures from LV, which is not as quick as the real dual ISO... oh well.. I guess it was a silly idea, it doesn't work with a slow shutter speed anyway. hehe.

Yes, I understand, but you could capture just only 2 frames as fast as possible to make it more like a photo.
I will do one test tomorow with highest HDR RAW video resolution and highest framerate, and combine the first 2 DNGs.

Please don't hit me if my idea is stupid: how about faking a dual iso with 2 quick liveview captures, each one at different iso.

Thanks for your work! Really excited and I hope we can also get dual ISO.

ADTG shutter, what is that? Can you dumb it down a little for people like me?

Looks great!

Am I the only one with a 6D or what?
Ok I tried a new workflow on this quick shot.
Imported the .dng sequence in AE, adjusted with Camera RAW directly, upscaled from 1536 to 1920 with instant HD, and exported with a real H264 codec. You can't imagine how I struggle to learn how to use AE for the first time.
The result is much cleaner than the previous shots at least on the saved files more than on youtube, and the shadows don't seem to be flickering as with the bird.
Since it's a 1:1 crop from sensor, lens quality is more of a limit than actual shot resolution now.

Now to learn how to really edit and put some clips together.