Okay. Everyone, pls come here. Here here. This is very interesting & very important. So people, do you realize that all these times over the past few years, big brands like Canon (we had), Nikon, Sigma, Fuji, Panasonic Lumix, Sony Alpha, etc. etc. etc. lacks something? Something every essential, that should've been like, How in the world (swearingly), that this feature never been here to this day? And especially,
Why must we make Magic Lantern just so Canon can have RAW Video capability?!
I know, shockers, yes. I've went Vsauce here. But look at the title again. look above.
I mean, all cameras have RAW, all brands there is. Even smartphones too, look at my Samsung Galaxy, it can shoot RAW in Pro photo mode! But... No RAW video? the only reachable to certain amount of people is this, the Magic Lantern which of course a hack. And look at those poor budget artist who cannot buy expensive cinema camera. They stuck on H.264, or worse. Nothing RAW, nothing raw from sensor for video, already destructed.
Now pls collect these videos: Search red raw patent YouTube
Okay pls watch those later when you have time. Not now. Here, let me summarize.
The reason why, none of the consumer brand had Video RAW support is because... RED. yeah, that bas8888. You see what I'm talking about? Okay, ARRI has their own RAW, but ummmmm mmmmm it's their in house, idk why haven't we adopted this yet, because again, it's haaaaaaaard, I have no idea actually. also ARRI is expensive, and we are budget. But all, RED is all behind this, they expect all royalties no matter what whenever it's about RAW Video, it seems. They had the patent, and this Mr. Oakley abuses it to.... yeah you know.
Now you see, you people have achieved what it supposed to be. adding RAW Video to a camera where it should've been. Amazing Awesome, I'm impressed. It should be easy, it is easy. It did easy. In fact all cameras have RAW capability, but again, RED the bas8888 keeps them from doing it unless they can succ blood to thirst first (Royalty or Sue). In fact many company tried to fight back but somehow judges favors RED 💀.
Now, today I heard Nikon is being sued, for you guessed it, RAW video on the Nikon Z9. Man, Nikon used TicoRAW, but RED is RED, and RED never REST if there is competition, idk. I know Nikon isn't our side, but we gotta still hope Nikon wins, because if not, you know how lack step in tech would we still been. Pls, RAW Video all camera! developing hacks are risky & haaaaaaaaaaaaard!
well, that's all. thancc for your attention. feel free to talk about this here, idk.
by JOELwindows7
Perkedel Technologies
CC4.0-BY-SA
Why must we make Magic Lantern just so Canon can have RAW Video capability?!
I know, shockers, yes. I've went Vsauce here. But look at the title again. look above.
I mean, all cameras have RAW, all brands there is. Even smartphones too, look at my Samsung Galaxy, it can shoot RAW in Pro photo mode! But... No RAW video? the only reachable to certain amount of people is this, the Magic Lantern which of course a hack. And look at those poor budget artist who cannot buy expensive cinema camera. They stuck on H.264, or worse. Nothing RAW, nothing raw from sensor for video, already destructed.
Now pls collect these videos: Search red raw patent YouTube
- https://youtu.be/__X25Fr2K_M
- https://youtu.be/Z4B3yKwrKvQ
- https://youtu.be/WeM2D1-yTzo
- https://youtu.be/dIpFw96s6Wc
- https://youtube.com/shorts/jj-mHLfvWzE?feature=share
Okay pls watch those later when you have time. Not now. Here, let me summarize.
The reason why, none of the consumer brand had Video RAW support is because... RED. yeah, that bas8888. You see what I'm talking about? Okay, ARRI has their own RAW, but ummmmm mmmmm it's their in house, idk why haven't we adopted this yet, because again, it's haaaaaaaard, I have no idea actually. also ARRI is expensive, and we are budget. But all, RED is all behind this, they expect all royalties no matter what whenever it's about RAW Video, it seems. They had the patent, and this Mr. Oakley abuses it to.... yeah you know.
Now you see, you people have achieved what it supposed to be. adding RAW Video to a camera where it should've been. Amazing Awesome, I'm impressed. It should be easy, it is easy. It did easy. In fact all cameras have RAW capability, but again, RED the bas8888 keeps them from doing it unless they can succ blood to thirst first (Royalty or Sue). In fact many company tried to fight back but somehow judges favors RED 💀.
Now, today I heard Nikon is being sued, for you guessed it, RAW video on the Nikon Z9. Man, Nikon used TicoRAW, but RED is RED, and RED never REST if there is competition, idk. I know Nikon isn't our side, but we gotta still hope Nikon wins, because if not, you know how lack step in tech would we still been. Pls, RAW Video all camera! developing hacks are risky & haaaaaaaaaaaaard!
well, that's all. thancc for your attention. feel free to talk about this here, idk.
by JOELwindows7
Perkedel Technologies
CC4.0-BY-SA