Hi, I did some review on the R6 Mark II, for low light photos only. It is in french here :
https://www.webastro.net/forums/topic/236222-test-complet-canon-eos-r6-mark-ii/
I also found it has the two offsets of 512 below 320 ISO and 2048 from 400 ISO.
The 200 ISO setting is worse (noise/dynamic) than 100 and 400 ISO.
Strange thing happens to the RAW when looking at the FFT of the bias images, two horizontal lines below and above the central module line... maybe due to Dual Pixels ?
Fred
https://www.webastro.net/forums/topic/236222-test-complet-canon-eos-r6-mark-ii/
I also found it has the two offsets of 512 below 320 ISO and 2048 from 400 ISO.
The 200 ISO setting is worse (noise/dynamic) than 100 and 400 ISO.
Strange thing happens to the RAW when looking at the FFT of the bias images, two horizontal lines below and above the central module line... maybe due to Dual Pixels ?
Fred