Hi, and first, a massive THANKS to all the Devs who have made RAW on the 5D2., possible.
However, I am alarmred with the 'idea' of downgrading the 5D2 to only 1856 !
I have always believed that the core of Magic Lantern, was the pursuit of quality, not convenience.
Unified ? Mass marketing - Consumer - " One size fits all".
I bought a 5D2 because of Magic Lantern, not because it was a Canon.
I am therfore sadened by the idea that it maybe downgraded, to 'fit' in with other cameras.
There is no argument, that can show that less pixels are, 'the same', or, better than more.
In pure science, and in the 'real' world, this is NONsense.
I offer my total support to Reddeercity, who speaks sense.
Quality first, Please !
However, I am alarmred with the 'idea' of downgrading the 5D2 to only 1856 !
I have always believed that the core of Magic Lantern, was the pursuit of quality, not convenience.
Unified ? Mass marketing - Consumer - " One size fits all".
I bought a 5D2 because of Magic Lantern, not because it was a Canon.
I am therfore sadened by the idea that it maybe downgraded, to 'fit' in with other cameras.
There is no argument, that can show that less pixels are, 'the same', or, better than more.
In pure science, and in the 'real' world, this is NONsense.
I offer my total support to Reddeercity, who speaks sense.
Quality first, Please !