Quote from: Protoltype on January 19, 2014, 02:53:54 AM
Yeah there are 2 more resolutions betweeen these: 1728x606 and 1856x650
1600x560 @ 60fps = 13 seconds
1728x606 @ 60fps = 5 seconds
1856x650 @ 60fps = 3 seconds
1600x560 @ 50fps = continuos !
1728x606 @ 50fps = continuos !
1856x650 @ 50fps = 9 seconds
1920x672 @ 50fps = 5-6 seconds
All tests with:
SanDisk 160MB/s 64GB CF
ML Build Aug22 (raw_rec module)
Global Draw = Off
Small Hacks = ON
Preview = Canon
I think the bottleneck here is not the card itself.
It is the Canon 5D Mark3 or Magic Lantern.
The Canon 5D Mark3 is probably overloaded with processing when it records with 60fps so there is not enough processing power left to write the RAW data with ML fast enough.
If I am wrong, please someone correct me.
But why are you so hungry to record with 60fps raw.
I think even 50fps is not worth it shooting raw because the quality is not so beautiful like the 24fps raw 1920x1080.
The vertical resolution is squashed hardly so you loose information which you have to stretch in post....
For slow motion I would better shoot with 24 or 25 fps raw continuosly and slow the footage down in post with the plugin twixtor or the foundry's kronos.
Glad to help you out
Thank you again, this kind of information was hard to find. I'm so into slow-motion because I'm hoping to use the Mark lll's raw for music video production. Creating fake frames using Twixtor is either a big "no-no" or really time consuming in its full version. You would need to mask everything, etc. Unnecessary hell. 1728x606 looks promising Kudos for doing all these benchmarks for us!