Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - DGB

#1
Thank to both of you.  Should have said, I had come to realize I needn't double-click on the auto exec file; that was something I did while I was figuring out how to install ML the first time 'round.  Only included that observation in my post because of my other uncertainty about the "new "ML-SETUP.FIR" file.

Have downloaded the Nov. 10 version and I, too, am "chuffed" to install it tonight!  Will make sure I've only got one ".fir" file.

All the best,

Dave
#2
Hi djfort, you kindly posted this link to an audio-remote-shot enabled build of ML:

Quote from: dfort on September 07, 2015, 08:51:59 AM
Cutting to the chase, here's a link to a test build that has AUDIO_REMOTE_SHOT enabled.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3d6zpxnndvhxpoa/magiclantern-Nightly.2015Aug21.EOSM202.zip

When downloaded this, rather than an "EOSM_202.fir," I got a file named "ML-SETUP.FIR".  Further, when I double-click on the autoexec.bin file, rather than it producing another file with the same name with ".cpgz" appended to its tail (which other builds I've downloaded do), I get a message saying I don't have permission to open it.  Sorry for the caution, but am I good to use these files, or has something changed since you first posted them?

Thanks,

Dave
#3
General Help Q&A / Re: Stable build | Latest builds
November 03, 2015, 05:43:27 PM
Great, thanks very much!

D
#4
General Help Q&A / Re: Stable build | Latest builds
November 02, 2015, 10:19:59 PM
Hi, have never installed ML yet, now's the time.  Please help me out by clarifying: The current Nightly Build for the EOS-M has "failed," I see.  Went back through the logs for the most recent build that was not labeled "failed," and that was: 2015-04-18 18:08:06 - 0400, change set e08c6c0.  My question is, should that version be all right [all standard caveats aside of course] for me to install, or does the fact that there were more recent builds mean that Canon's firmware or something changed, so that 4-18 build is no longer good?

Much appreciated,

Dave