Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Alex Roman

#1
I'm a bit confused. It seems that the last (7Aug) A1ex build has a huge step forward regarding antialiasing (which is really awesome BTW) but... how does this translates into video performance? Does it has huge advantage as well? Video samples anyone?

Thnx.

A1ex: i see, thank you. Looking so forward for it.
#2
Quote from: Danne on July 29, 2013, 02:05:46 PM
Hi Alex. They,re fullres pics. Good stuff :)

I see. Thanks ;)
#3
Hey Danne, thanks for these; look awesome. Quick question: are they downscaled video frames or just full res pics? Also, which ISO interval on these? (artifacts are minimal)

thnx
#5
Quote from: Danne on July 26, 2013, 10:19:48 AM
...maybe real estate filming getting the highligts from windows and so on. When taking stills it works really well.

I also see amazing serious cinema 14-stops DR beautifully rendered imagery...  ;)
#6
Certainly is a huge step taking stills! On the other hand, i think the real revolution comes with (pretty) usable dual iso video function -which from what i see is taking giant steps in fews days-

Looking forward to see more dual iso clips (no that agressive interval ones?)  8)
#7
Quote from: Danne on July 26, 2013, 06:46:52 AM
There is hardly any visible difference in the first pictures as you can see which is a good thing. It is when you start to push the shadows out that you start to see a subtle difference, This gets more visible when you shoot in contrasty situations but there is still a difference, slightly.
The movie raws are about 350mb each, to big to upload from where I sit atm. You can play around with two extracted dng-files if you like :). Link below.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4tCJMlOYfirTTRETlpaQnZVMG8/edit?usp=sharing

@Ilias G. I don,t see anything wrong with the single iso-file?

Danne, it's amazing, thanks. Video is getting better and better (whitefix?)... Only some blur in highlights so it seems to begin to be pretty usable now. Is that interpolation becomes less noticiable with smaller interval (i.e 400-100)?