Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Sane__

Pages: [1] 2
1
Hello i got a lame question.Is it possible to upscale the raw file before export it in prores?I'm using 5d mark II and i find that i lose quality when i upscale the prores from 1856 to 1920 but not when i upscale the cndg files.

2
Hello guys, sorry for the lame question but what is the difference and benefits between Cinelog and VisionLog?

3
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 5D Mark II / 5D2
« on: February 22, 2015, 10:57:48 PM »
Thank you, btw i don't have an option for 1872  , only for 1856 res with the latest nightly build Audionut.

4
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 5D Mark II / 5D2
« on: February 22, 2015, 10:44:05 PM »
reddeercity your help is absolutely enormous! Now everything makes sense! One last question, does it make quality difference if in canon menu i set quality to jpeg instead of raw?

5
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 5D Mark II / 5D2
« on: February 21, 2015, 07:24:00 PM »
Hello i'm using latest nightly build but can someone explain me why i can't get 1872x936 (2:1)
and i can get max 1856x844 in RAW 1.0 ? Also ,does someone have budget external monitor solution that works with magic lantern (at least for preview, not for recording, i've tried DSLR controller app , but it doesn't show the magic lantern menus) Thanks!

6
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 5D Mark II / 5D2
« on: February 08, 2015, 04:57:25 AM »
Thank you! It's very good to know that there is no quality difference between crops (at least if you don't rescale).I'm looking at sandisk 1067x, because Lexar is really out of my price range (i'm from Europe and here the price difference is a killer).

7
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 5D Mark II / 5D2
« on: February 07, 2015, 11:03:02 PM »
Hello i got two questions.First if i shoot 2:35:1 resolution is below Full HD but does the quality is actually lower or just crops the sensor?If i use letterbox  2:35:1 will there be any quality difference between full hd and max 2:35-1 resolution in 5dmark2.Also what is the best 32 gb CF card you've used beside Komputerbay which have very mixed opinions?

8
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 5D Mark II / 5D2
« on: February 02, 2015, 08:20:35 PM »
Very helpful! Thanks!

9
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 5D Mark II / 5D2
« on: February 02, 2015, 07:17:25 PM »
Thanks! Can you shoot at maximum resolution at 25fps?

10
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 5D Mark II / 5D2
« on: February 01, 2015, 12:14:30 PM »
Hello guys what is the maximum fps in full hd in raw? I want to do some slow motion shots (not insanely ,around 20-30% slower than original) and i'm just curious.Is 24fps the maxmimum?Also , does someone tried it with twixtor?

11
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 5D Mark II / 5D2
« on: January 25, 2015, 04:36:56 AM »
Thanks. My budget is kinda limited and my dilemma was between bmpcc ,7d and 5d mark ii.But with Bmpcc i will have to invest at least 1000$ to make it alright for my needs (speedbooster,batteries and cards)

12
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 5D Mark II / 5D2
« on: January 24, 2015, 03:25:04 PM »
Thank you! Last question i promise! Do you think it's worth it to buy 5Dmark2 or buy 7D , is the improvement in raw really noticeable?

13
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 5D Mark II / 5D2
« on: January 24, 2015, 01:13:47 PM »
Hey i'm interested in dynamic range with 5d2 raw.Is it on par with bmpcc? Any idea how many stops?

14
Duplicate Questions / Very quick question about Raw capabilities
« on: January 11, 2015, 06:50:58 PM »
Hello. I currently own a canon 600d/t3i  and use it very,very rearly(my job is at post production/vfx so i don't have to shoot anything) I want to shoot raw and use it for personal/portfolio projects but i don't want to invest ton of money for it.Initialy i planned BMPCC but when you stack the accsesories just to make it work alright it just doesn't justify the cost for me. So my dilemma is - 50d vs 7D for raw? I have no intention to buy VAF moire filter so could you give me advice which of these two produce more stable, better looking image(moire for example). Thanks in advance!

15
Tragic Lantern / Re: 600D/T3i Raw Video
« on: October 27, 2013, 09:35:02 PM »
720p mode has Downscaling. Awful problems with antialiasing. I wouldn't recommend it

16
Tragic Lantern / Re: 600D/T3i Raw Video
« on: October 19, 2013, 02:21:40 PM »
Here's two frames from the short film I was talking about earlier. First one's the source file (RAW --> raw2cdng.exe). The second one is a processed one, upscaled to 1080p. That's roughly the color palette i'll be using to grade the film. Click on the picture so see the full resolution ones.

Shot at 100ISO, Hanimex 28mm f/2.8 @ f/5.6 or f/8 (can't remember), 1408x528 (2,67:1, max 240-250 frames)


Source


Processed


I think it looks great and the image upscales very well. But I have no shame in admitting my cinescope fetish and I love these widescreen images, which allow me to record longer at higher resolutions. Now obviously that's not always an option. The higher the aspect ratio the lower resolution you're gonna need to use.

I can't wait  to see some footage!

17
Tragic Lantern / Re: 600D/T3i Raw Video
« on: October 05, 2013, 06:18:32 AM »
This thread is so dead... Just delete it and stop our miserable agony called "600d Raw" please...

18
Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video
« on: September 24, 2013, 09:01:45 PM »
What you mean dude? raw video? if so.. its still the same, just more user friendly and get extra frames :)

Hey, thanks , can you tell me what is the maximum resolution and maximum seconds you can get at 24 fps with the newest build? :)

19
Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video
« on: September 24, 2013, 06:48:59 PM »
Show us some samples with the newest build :)

20
Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video
« on: September 21, 2013, 05:57:01 PM »
maybe connect your camera (with SD card inside) via USB cable to your PC? Just an idea, idk if it works.

This is not an idea :) This is the first thought everyone would think of. If you don't know if it works it's bad idea to give an advice

21
Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video
« on: September 17, 2013, 10:26:23 PM »
I have a very very stupid question. I already have Magic Lantern 2.3 but my card reader is broken and i'm in a place where i can't buy another.Is it possible to install tragic lantern without a card reader?

22
Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video
« on: September 17, 2013, 06:35:37 PM »
RAW Video is so exciting. It's high resolution VIDEO.



1728 x 736 / 23.976p
EF-S18-55mm F3.5-5.6
Sandisk Extreme Pro SD card

Is this with 600d? How did you get resolution this high?

23
Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video
« on: August 17, 2013, 05:13:19 PM »
Using RAW video at 1152:624 at 16frps i was able to capture this.


It looks absolutely terrible...

24
Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video
« on: July 02, 2013, 09:19:44 PM »
Thank You

25
Tragic Lantern / Re: Uncompressed 600D Raw Video
« on: July 02, 2013, 05:24:28 PM »
Hey at that moment i don't have the chance to test it myself so i want to ask you, what is the highest possible resolution you can shoot raw at lest 3-4 seconds (i'm NOT interested with continious) at 23.976 (24 fps) ?

Pages: [1] 2