Messages

1

Raw Video Postprocessing / Re: MLVProducer

« on: April 11, 2017, 01:19:19 PM »

Can it process 10bit dual ISO removing focus pixels of eos-m?
I know, it's tricky.

2

General Development / Re: Hypothesis about HDR

« on: April 05, 2017, 09:25:07 AM »

Dual ISO make the same thing without ghosting, am I correct?
24bit hdr raw video? Is there something on the market capable of this?
It's seams a gymnastick thing, but... Why not!
Port it to eos-m please 

3

Other experimental builds / Re: 12-bit (and 10-bit) RAW video development discussion

« on: November 30, 2016, 11:13:54 AM »

Is it possible shoot in 10bit with dual-iso, and recreate 14bit in post?

4

Feature Requests / Re: mv1080 on EOSM

« on: February 12, 2016, 05:41:30 PM »

Sure, I vote for this!

5

General Development / Re: Dealing with Focus Pixels in raw video

« on: January 17, 2016, 07:32:05 PM »

How can I help?

6

General Development / Re: Dealing with Focus Pixels in raw video

« on: January 17, 2016, 04:53:29 PM »

Chroma smoothing over the entire image means some loss in contrast and "real" resolution, imho, and wrong results in dual iso.
For my test, I take a SP in "simple" mode of my room wall; in rawtherapee I've selected "none" for demosaicing filter, than exported as png; in Photoshop, simply selected single channels and made considerations by eyes.

7

General Development / Re: Dealing with Focus Pixels in raw video

« on: January 17, 2016, 03:41:26 PM »

Made some test exporting not-demosaicing picture taken with "simple" Silent Picture whit Eos M (using rawtherapee, and photoshop to view single color channel), and it seems that focus pixels involved are only the red ones, maybe some blue ones, but not green. I'm tryng to figure out if the influence on the blue ones is some sort of "ghost" due to my test condition.

image here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2JqnkAmnNAZTEhjNkZrdHlYdTg

8

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: June 09, 2014, 08:22:36 AM »

Sorry for the absence, preatty busy weeks! I'm going to continue my tests

9

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 29, 2014, 05:51:12 PM »

Thank you, guys

10

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 28, 2014, 08:28:56 AM »

Uhm, what about this:
in mlv a tag say the stream is interlaced
Raw2dng reed the tag, than separate fields and create new fake fields (gb for the rg, and viceversa) with value=0. This way we can have a normal debayer of rg fields of a time A, without interference by gb fields of the time B, am I right? (The other way around is to write a new specific debayer algorithme... But it seems pretty complicated!)
If I'm correct, than we have full temphoral resolution on Green channel to use in motion estimation that would be sufficent, i hope, to reconstruct well missing information.

11

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 27, 2014, 07:32:24 PM »

well, in my case larger=useless

skipping one line takes problems in debayering? Audionut said it take resolution down to 1/4: if it's true, it is useless too.

12

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 27, 2014, 07:02:06 PM »

and... whait a minute: uncompressed YUV422 video? I want that!

13

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 27, 2014, 06:57:43 PM »

I was thinking of debayer on pc and deinterlace after that: am I getting it wrong?

14

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 27, 2014, 06:27:29 PM »

I don't unterstand: in a theoretical interlaced frame we have all red point (not half) of a time A, and all blue point of a time B. Is it not possible debayer it normaly, getting full red channel of time A (but no of time B), and full blue channel of time B (but no of time A)? Maybe have half green point for time A, and half green point of time B will get wrong output?

Untill some days ago, I thought any pixel had all 3 channels, I didn't know all debayer thing so... sorry for the stupid questions.

15

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 27, 2014, 12:17:51 PM »

I'l try again.

16

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 27, 2014, 11:18:07 AM »

from my experiment, with deinterlacing two fields source you get quarter resolution too 

17

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 27, 2014, 11:02:54 AM »

I already did it. 
It's frustating to know to be so close

18

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 27, 2014, 10:31:44 AM »

I'm so near to get it! (the avisynth part )
I've sinthetized the new red channel for GB rows , but I'm getting a ghosts of near frames too. I'm sure it's just for my non-existent coding-skills.

Audionut, can you help me? This is my post on avisynth forum where I explain what I did and the problem.

19

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 25, 2014, 02:42:57 PM »

On RG and GB: we could reconstruct blue channel for the first field by motion estimation interpolation of the second field, and viceversa for the red channel, using full temporal resolution green channel for good motion estimation. Yes, I think this is the way; "2 rows" deinterlace lose too much details.

20

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 25, 2014, 01:17:56 AM »

If somebody want to try something, this is a 5 frames clip interlaced 2by2

21

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 24, 2014, 07:47:22 PM »

I manage to get this frame to experiment, and I believe we have to find a way to manage the "RG and GB" thing  : 2 lines don't seems to work.


And after some test with "RG and GB", I know that if it's possible, I don't kow how to do 

22

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 24, 2014, 05:31:59 PM »

For now, I'm tryng to make an avisynth script to make "2 lines" interlaced" script (to deinterlace after). Sugestion?

23

Feature Requests / Re: Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 24, 2014, 03:35:00 PM »

I made the very same test of Audionut, so no point to upload it
I'm going to make some test with 2 lines ('couse I've not a clue to how to manage the  "RG and GB" thing)

24

Feature Requests / Raw video interlaced for SD camera

« on: May 24, 2014, 11:05:10 AM »

SD camera has big limit in resolution for raw recording, and interlaced video can be a good work-around. 1080i can be converted in a good-enough 1080p with 3D deinterlacing magic from avisynth and his filter, and this tecnique can bring fake-4k raw to CF camera too!
It's not the real thing, but 3D deinterlacing can bring some amazing resoult. I'll definitely pay for such a feature!

25

Camera-specific Development / Re: EOSM-Updated ML for 2.02 firmware

« on: May 07, 2014, 08:22:30 AM »

based on my math EOS M, in crop mode and with 1472x626 resolution (2.35:1 and max resolution for continuous RAW recording), use a sensor area slightly larger than 1/2" format: every lens with the same (or larger) projection area is usable, but I can't verify.

Any news on Dual Iso for this little beast? Does it work now?