I decided to compare the available dynamic range of the RAW to the standard compressed footage by shooting a high contrast scene and bringing up the shadow brightness. The RAW video is grainier than I thought it would be in the shadows (with roughly 50% noise reduction), that being said, it still looks way better than the H.264.
- Welcome to Magic Lantern Forum.
News:
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages1
#2
Raw Video / Re: 60D RAW video - it's working !!!
May 30, 2013, 01:45:28 AM
I managed to achieve 247 frames of 1280x536 (2.39:1) RAW with my 60D and a Transcend 32GB class 10 card.
Here is a test clip comparing the RAW to the H.264.
http://youtu.be/Pr3QJP_53-Y
The footage is ungraded. The H.264 was shot with the cloudy WB setting and Picture style with reduced contrast and saturation.
If it wasn't raining, I would have gotten some nicer beauty shots but this clip does a decent job of demonstrating the enhanced detail in the distance.
Here is a test clip comparing the RAW to the H.264.
http://youtu.be/Pr3QJP_53-Y
The footage is ungraded. The H.264 was shot with the cloudy WB setting and Picture style with reduced contrast and saturation.
If it wasn't raining, I would have gotten some nicer beauty shots but this clip does a decent job of demonstrating the enhanced detail in the distance.
Pages1