Quote from: stevefal on May 23, 2013, 08:28:12 PM
Notice hot pixels flaring on her zipper below the pendant at ~1:03.
You're right... I'm seeing them too now. Not just in that one clip, but others too. Is this happening with anyone else's footage?
Etiquette, expectations, entitlement...
@autoexec_bin | #magiclantern | Discord | Reddit | Server issues
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: stevefal on May 23, 2013, 08:28:12 PM
Notice hot pixels flaring on her zipper below the pendant at ~1:03.
Quote from: haysuess on May 23, 2013, 05:23:44 PM
This was posted in the "Raw video on 5DMK2" thread, but I thought it was well worth mentioning in case it hasn't been seen by all.
If you have RAW selected as your photo type and record, say you get 100 frames at any given resolution and fps.
If you then change your photo settings to disable RAW and shoot only Small JPG, you'll get MANY more frames of RAW video.
It seems like there was 2-3 more *'s worth of buffer when I did this.
Benchmarks are the same, so it appears it just opens up some more buffer room.
In my tests, I went from 150-170 frames to 290 just like that!
Quote from: platu on May 18, 2013, 11:49:15 AM
I get similar speed results as you with my 128. I have written about this issue here and on Cinema5D. Bottom line, the KomputerBay 128s seem to be slower then the 64s. Cinema5D has assured me that their 128s are fast so they just might have been lucky with theirs. EOSHD was using 64s for his tests. Most current reports of the 128s are benchmarking around 70MB/s.
Page created in 0.099 seconds with 14 queries.