Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - PressureFM

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7
1
Camera-specific Development / Re: Canon 5D Mark II / 5D2
« on: May 02, 2017, 11:09:57 PM »
I'm looking for a couple of startup logs, using this build:

http://builds.magiclantern.fm/jenkins/view/Experiments/job/startup-log/

These will log all Canon messages from the first 30 seconds, then save a log file. During this log, I need you to capture the following actions (not all at once, but divided over a couple of logs):

- menu navigation (just browse around)
- play mode navigation (view a picture, zoom in, toggle histograms etc)
- card format and restoring ML
- changing various Canon settings
- LiveView (for future use)
- autofocus (same)

Why? I'm getting really close to emulating the 5D2 in QEMU (it boots almost all the way until the GUI, and CF emulation works - see the DCIM test), but I'm missing something. These logs may help figuring it out.

(50D already works, with Canon menu navigation, card formatting and so on; figured it out from this log)

I can do it first thing in the weekend. Currently about to move so all equipment is packed down.

2
How can people with 5D2 help?

3
General Chat / Re: 5Tb with no hitches
« on: July 04, 2015, 01:43:52 PM »
Share the video when ready or some snaps of your journey while we wait :)

4
Hardware and Accessories / Re: TASCAM DR-60D mkII DSLR Audio Recorder
« on: February 18, 2015, 09:24:23 PM »
You can also grab the Zoom H5 Portable Recorder now for $229.99 (MSRP $337).

And yes, this one is also much better than the Beachtek ;)

3 days left on the TASCAM DR-60D mkII DSLR Audio Recorder and 9 days left on the Zoom H5.

5
Hardware and Accessories / Re: TASCAM DR-60D mkII DSLR Audio Recorder
« on: February 13, 2015, 10:20:01 AM »
They don't compare, the Beachtek doesn't even have XLR/Phantom inputs, has much worse S/N rating etc.

6
Hardware and Accessories / TASCAM DR-60D mkII DSLR Audio Recorder
« on: February 12, 2015, 08:56:17 PM »
If anyone is looking to improve their audio solution with their DSLR, the TASCAM DR-60D mkII is on Massdrop right now for $164.99 (MSRP $249.99).

Might be interesting for some of you :)

7
General Chat / Re: New 5D S and R version
« on: February 07, 2015, 12:28:53 PM »
@chmee

Incidentally, it does exactly 7680 x 4360 at 16:9.

Aspect Ratio: 16:9
  • Large: Approx. 42.5 Megapixels (8688 x 4888)
    Medium 1: Approx. 33.2 Megapixels (7680 x 4320)
    Medium 2: Approx. 18.7 Megapixels (5760 x 3240)
    S1 (Small 1): Approx. 10.5 Megapixels (4320 x 2432)
    S2 (Small 2): Approx. 2.1 Megapixels (1920 x 1080)
    S3 (Small 3): Approx. 0.28 Megapixels (720 x 408)

If ML is possible on the camera, the USB3 connection suddenly gets interesting. Hopefully it isn't hampered like the SD card speed of the 5D Mark III.

Could make for some nice clean 1080p and 2160p. I am still scratching my head over the lack of clean HDMI output ... and 4K.

8
If you want something self-contained and smaller, check out the FiiO E06 portable headphone amplifier.

9
General Chat / Re: Apertus Axiom Beta
« on: October 02, 2014, 05:27:26 PM »
Shame I don't have 2300+ laying around right now.

They should have run the campaign over 2 months instead of one.

10
General Chat / Re: Apertus Axiom Beta
« on: September 27, 2014, 04:36:17 PM »
UH those fps possible with axiom beta? HMMMMMM nice :D

They are talking about the sensor itself. The Axiom Beta is limited by its hardware and HDMI output.

11
General Chat / Re: Apertus Axiom Beta
« on: September 27, 2014, 10:33:13 AM »
Very informative!

Hope the project gets off the ground because ML have really shown why an Open Source environment would be great for the users.

12
General Development / Re: DIGIC4 cameras, faster DMA flags - please test
« on: September 26, 2014, 04:41:59 PM »
Mercurial changeset e12ad3d84e7b (ML Nightly 2014Sep12)
RAW_REC 1856x1044 25 fps 1x

Code: [Select]
1045
927
999
1057
1088
933
1117
1109
1010
1006
Average: ~1031 frames (removed highest and lowest score)

RAW_REC 1856x1044 25 fps 3x

Code: [Select]
1529
1596
1787
1456
1473
1554
1447
1359
1457
1549
Average: ~1508 frames (removed highest and lowest score)

Mercurial changeset 559643aff9ca+ (ML Nightly 2014Sep09)
RAW_REC 1856x1044 25 fps 1x Sep09

Code: [Select]
1191
1015
1172
1091
1244 (4ms idle)
1214 (3ms idle)
1104 (3ms idle)
1034
1138
1006

Average: ~1120 frames (removed highest and lowest score)

RAW_REC 1856x1044 25 fps 3x Sep09

Code: [Select]
2404 (501ms idle)
2422 (502ms idle)
2080 (368ms idle)
2537 (494ms idle)
2206 (489ms idle)
1932 (483ms idle)
2829 (496ms idle)
2090 (361ms idle)
1924 (492ms idle)
2483 (477ms idle)

Average: ~2269 frames (removed highest and lowest score)

I noticed that as soon as it broke the 4GB barrier it went from 4-12ms idle to 361+ ms idle. Something we should check into?

I saw write speeds up to 79,3MB/s (which is the fastest I’ve seen from this KomputerBay 1000x 32GB card).

It doesn't seem like I can make the Buffer Graphs with the RAW_REC module, is that correct?

13
General Development / Re: DIGIC4 cameras, faster DMA flags - please test
« on: September 24, 2014, 12:11:50 PM »
Sorry for the large post.










Check the way I formatted your post :) //Audionut
Thanks :) //PressureFM

14
General Development / Re: DIGIC4 cameras, faster DMA flags - please test
« on: September 24, 2014, 09:13:58 AM »
Any easy way I can attach the buffer graphs I've made?

15
General Development / Re: DIGIC4 cameras, faster DMA flags - please test
« on: September 23, 2014, 06:45:48 PM »
Well, if you want some specific tests, I'll gladly do them before committing.

16
General Development / Re: DIGIC4 cameras, faster DMA flags - please test
« on: September 23, 2014, 01:35:19 PM »
Mercurial changeset e12ad3d84e7b (ML Nightly 2014Sep12)
RAW 1856x1044 25fps 1x

Code: [Select]
576
573
727
548
579
474
539
534
641
594

Average: ~573 frames (removed highest and lowest score)

RAW 1856x1044 25fps 3x
Code: [Select]
526
779 (1ms idle)
616
804 (11ms idle)
642 (2ms idle)
658
561
655
765
618 (1ms idle)

Average: ~662 frames (removed highest and lowest score)

Mercurial changeset 559643aff9ca+ (ML Nightly 2014Sep09)
RAW 1856x1044 25fps 1x

Code: [Select]
580
542
603
575
618
571
605
653
594
591

Average: ~592 frames (removed highest and lowest score)

RAW 1856x1044 25fps 3x

Code: [Select]
790 (5ms idle)
667 (4ms idle)
777 (1ms idle)
607
587 (2ms idle)
728
681
737
586
695

Average: ~685 frames (removed highest and lowest score)

17
General Development / Re: DIGIC4 cameras, faster DMA flags - please test
« on: September 22, 2014, 09:17:13 PM »
Ok, I'll redo the test with different resolutions and count frames.

18
General Development / Re: DIGIC4 cameras, faster DMA flags - please test
« on: September 22, 2014, 06:13:07 PM »
On 5D Mark II.

Build 559643aff9ca+ (ML Nightly.2014Sep09)

edmac_memcopy : 318.26MB/s
edmac_copy_rectangle : 256.93 MB/s

Build e12ad3d84e7b (ML Nightly.2014Sep12)

edmac_memcopy : 393.08 MB/sec
edmac_copy_rectangle : 290.02 MB/s

Build 75649ffe291b+ (ML v2.3.NEXT.2014Feb04)

edmac_memcopy : 287.96 MB/s
edmac_copy_rectangle : 259.25 MB/s

I got the BMPs for all the benchmarks but I can't seem to attach them.

19
Can anyone make a build with Pull Request #589 for the 5D Mark II, so we can test if it is faster on DIGIC4?

20
General Development / Re: DIGIC4 cameras, faster DMA flags - please test
« on: September 08, 2014, 04:13:15 PM »

21
General Development / Re: DIGIC4 cameras, faster DMA flags - please test
« on: September 08, 2014, 01:07:00 PM »
Anyone want to make a version for the 5D Mark II for me to test out?

22
Raw Video Postprocessing / Re: from raw to 4k
« on: August 26, 2014, 06:26:03 PM »
Why would you upscale 1080p to 2160p?

23
Hardware and Accessories / Re: False economy with CF cards
« on: August 21, 2014, 08:44:51 AM »
Which spurs the question, what card reader do you have for the CompactFlash cards?

24
Post-processing Workflow / Re: Too much contrast on MacBook ?!
« on: July 23, 2014, 08:06:08 PM »
Check your screens gamma value. Should be 2.2.

25
General Chat / Re: GH4 mucking up my decision
« on: July 09, 2014, 12:13:30 AM »
If you don't have the cash right now, then why not wait and see what new cameras come between now and then?


Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 7