Magic Lantern Forum

Using Magic Lantern => Post-processing Workflow => Timelapse Postprocessing => Topic started by: painya on October 30, 2013, 05:51:50 AM

Poll
Question: Do you use XMP or UFR for your deflickering?
Option 1: XMP votes: 11
Option 2: UFR votes: 2
Title: XMP vs UFR
Post by: painya on October 30, 2013, 05:51:50 AM
Just thought I'd get a thread going with people sharing what they preferred, and who does what.
Title: Re: XMP vs UFR
Post by: Marsu42 on October 30, 2013, 07:32:11 AM
I'm using xmp, but even if alex is the only one with ufraw I'm in favor of defaulting to open source software in ML (a similar thread here: http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=9078.msg85754;topicseen#msg85754)
Title: Re: XMP vs UFR
Post by: RenatoPhoto on October 30, 2013, 12:09:54 PM
I use xmp.
Title: Re: XMP vs UFR
Post by: dmilligan on October 30, 2013, 01:24:12 PM
I use an xmp based workflow, but I'm now doing deflickering in post with this script (http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=8850.0) I wrote, rather than in camera with ML. It uses basically the same algorithm as ML post deflicker, but has a little more flexibility since you're doing it in post (you can run it again with different settings, don't have to worry about missed frames b/c your interval was too short, etc.)

Quote from: Marsu42 on October 30, 2013, 07:32:11 AM
I'm using xmp, but even if alex is the only one with ufraw I'm in favor of defaulting to open source software in ML (a similar thread here: http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=9078.msg85754;topicseen#msg85754)
If you want to get technical, even though XMP is going to be typically utilized by users of comercial software (ACR/Lr) and UFR used by those using open source, XMP itself is an open standard (ISO 16684-1). IDK if the same can be said of the UFR format. Adobe has also released the code for their XMP Toolkit under a BSD license.

That being said, I don't really care which is the default, I don't think it's a big deal, and this should be removed from ML anyway once post tools to replace it are complete (I've tried to do my part on that!), since this is something that should be done in post not in camera.
Title: Re: XMP vs UFR
Post by: glubber on October 30, 2013, 01:35:47 PM
I voted for ufraw but use both.
If its gonna be tricky like day/night timelpases i use XMP/exiftool/Lightroom.
If it should get a simple timelapse with no light canges, i use ufraw coz its way faster then LR.
Title: Re: XMP vs UFR
Post by: LinuxGadget on October 30, 2013, 10:04:07 PM
xmp for me.
Title: Re: XMP vs UFR
Post by: painya on October 31, 2013, 01:32:19 AM
Quote from: Marsu42 on October 30, 2013, 07:32:11 AM
I'm using xmp, but even if alex is the only one with ufraw I'm in favor of defaulting to open source software in ML (a similar thread here: http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=9078.msg85754;topicseen#msg85754)
He's a developer (so it's ultimately up to him) and I wasn't trying to make a point on what should be default, sorry if it came off that way.