Magic Lantern Forum

The Mac version doesn´t open in my mac pro running osx 10.6.8

Linux wants the QT libraries so yes, cook them in.

Quote from: PlayIt on August 22, 2013, 05:08:54 AM
The Mac version doesn´t open in my mac pro running osx 10.6.8

Thanks, I'll update it tomorrow (it means re-building Qt statically which is a pain on a virtual machine) I need sleep.

Quote from: TheUnkn0wn on August 22, 2013, 05:14:59 AM
Thanks, I'll update it tomorrow (it means re-building Qt statically which is a pain on a virtual machine) I need sleep.

By god you are the unknown from those COD hacks. Your a bloody legend!

Very nice, thank you for the effort.
I will download and test the Windows version tomorrow.
:)

Drops mouse - runs to download!
;D

Thanks so much.

edit:
Woohoo, windows works on crappy old XP pro!

Wish I hadn't deleted all my old RAW files now :P

edit2:
after selecting the RAW file I accidentally chose DNG export, so I pressed cancel, on choose destination window, but I got a repeating runtime error. Escape killed app and error.

I find that my TIF frames have a lot of false color at high contrast edges and moire, is this intrinsic to the RAW file or a transcoding issue?

Would more recent ML builds solve that or should I pursue a DNG workflow? I find that the TIFs are more readily readble in other apps though.

PS I love the portable nature of these decoders, they are simple and easy to move.

550D
Win XP

Windows version is unstable by now, it sometimes outputs less frames than raw file consists of (with no compression option selected), sometimes there is some kind of tearing on several frames
(it looks even like a wrong frame numbering on playback)
(http://ipic.su/img/img7/fs/kiss_7kb.1377153225.jpg)

Hello from France,

It works well, but on Tiff I got some corrupt images, with horizontal lines...
Same problem with DNGs : frames looks correct when I just look at them one by one but when I play the sequence : frames jump's, horizontal deformation.....

Canon 5D Mark2
Windows 7 - 64b.

Excellent idea !
Thank you so much !

Francis

Any chance of .mlv format being implemented with this?   ;D

Thanks for your feedback, I'll look into everything today. You've managed to find things I never would of testing on my own.

On Mac OS X 10.8.4 I get this error:

Magic Lantern RAW - 1.0.0 cannot be opened because of a problem.

Check with the developer to make sure Magic Lantern RAW - 1.0.0 works with this version of OS X. You may need to reinstall the application. Be sure to install any available updates for the application and OS X.

Click Report to see more detailed information and send a report to Apple.

Relevant info from OS X crash report:

QuoteApplication Specific Information:
dyld: launch, loading dependent libraries

Dyld Error Message:
  Library not loaded: /usr/local/Qt-5.1.0/lib/QtWidgets.framework/Versions/5/QtWidgets
  Referenced from: /Users/USER/Downloads/Magic Lantern RAW - 1.0.0.app/Contents/MacOS/GUI
  Reason: image not found

Looks like the Mac version doesn't include its own copy of Qt5.  Since it is a 322kb zip that is a pretty safe bet.  I'd try to install the package version but I already have Qt in my dev environment and have no more room on this pesky SSD.

Thank youuu for this. Will give a try and report as soon as possible.

Windows 7
64bits

Quote from: wheezl on August 22, 2013, 01:55:50 PM
Relevant info from OS X crash report:


Looks like the Mac version doesn't include its own copy of Qt5.

Yup, same thing here.
Multi threading would be awesome, a time revolution!

@TheUnkn0wn asking gently, whats the benefit of your tool comparing to the other tools existing? with all due respect, better do some research/code in mlv, not raw.

http://magiclantern.wikia.com/wiki/RAW_Video#Programs_with_ML_raw_file_support

regards chmee

Quote from: chmee on August 22, 2013, 07:17:52 PM
@TheUnkn0wn asking gently, whats the benefit of your tool comparing to the other tools existing? with all due respect, better do some research/code in mlv, not raw.

http://magiclantern.wikia.com/wiki/RAW_Video#Programs_with_ML_raw_file_support

regards chmee

Read the features list, this is also multi-platform and standalone. Other tools require the ML 'raw2dng' tool and are merely a GUI for it. Currently the ML format isn't used, when it gets pushed to the branch I'll support it.

hello. great.!!
is dual iso RAW conversion also implemented in that release?
thx for your effort.!!


greets. sw

(*) rawmagic & raw2cdng do not use raw2dng.
(*) compression is an advantage - practically a sizereduction of ~10% (max ~20%)?
(*) are your dng's supported by speedgrade?

(*) i didnt wanted to be impolite - but i dont see any real benefit beside the compression - and i honestly recommend, to invest the time into mlv. thats it.

regards chmee

Updated to 1.1.0, please test the changes?

Quote from: chmee on August 22, 2013, 10:57:38 PM
(*) rawmagic & raw2cdng do not use raw2dng.
(*) compression is an advantage - practically a sizereduction of ~10% (max ~20%)?
(*) are your dng's supported by speedgrade?

(*) i didnt wanted to be impolite - but i dont see any real benefit beside the compression - and i honestly recommend, to invest the time into mlv. thats it.

regards chmee

Benefits
- Multi-Threading = Faster conversion from RAW to DNG
- Uses the Adobe DNG SDK for DNG support = Adobe are the creators of the DNG format
- Compression = Lossless JPEG compression, smaller file sizes
- Force Linear = On certain cameras when using a RAW_TYPE that doesn't contain pink dots (650D/700D/EOS-M) the DNG's can't be read correctly by dcraw which means software like RAWTherapee cannot process them correctly. This corrects this issue.
- Standalone = Portable. Doesn't require a folder of files for it to work.

Why don't you download and test it, let me know what you think. When the new Magic Lantern format for RAW is finally released I will add support.

P.S : http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=7122.0

QuoteThe first implementation is done and we can record in the new format.
post processing is still done with 'raw2dng' after converting the .mlv into the legacy .raw format using mlv_dump.

Runs fine now on my machine  OS X 10.8.4


Prcoessed a raw file. I'm going to compare the output to rawmagic.

Update:  The output is quite different than RawMagic.

update2: Here are two example frames.  The output is similar wether I pick force linear or uncompressed/lossless.

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/l98j41n4i224at4/3aDsarFWzE




I made no effort to find a decent light :)

Quote from: wheezl on August 23, 2013, 12:06:07 AM
Runs fine now on my machine  OS X 10.8.4


Prcoessed a raw file. I'm going to compare the output to rawmagic.

Update:  The output is quite different than RawMagic.

update2: Here are two example frames.  The output is similar wether I pick force linear or uncompressed/lossless.

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/l98j41n4i224at4/3aDsarFWzE




I made no effort to find a decent light :)

Interesting, looks like raw-magic applies more contrast.

Test ML Raw in Canon 7D in Win7 64bits

Version 1.0.0

Work good in all options. With Force Linear checked it give's me some purple fringe but give's me more big files. More quality with Force Linear?

Version 1.1.0

Work good in all options. But in the dng's all the colors acts strange. The dng's look like they are grey, in some part of the frame or other colors look like they are smooge/ghost image/color. Difficult to explain, if needed i can post some examples.

------

Its possible to load more then one file and output automatic the folders for the several loaded raw files?

I like this piece of software. It's easy to operate and maybe need some more options for configurations. But for me is ideal, extract more quality as possible from the raw file and then i make proxys in after effects with the dng's.

EDIT:

If i compare one dng from raw2dng and other from ML Raw 1.0.0 looks that ML Raw saturate more. Opposite from the rawmagic.

I couldn't get 1.1 of either the Mac or Windows version to work.

On Mac click process button, select RAW file from dialog, nothing happens.

On Windows, select File|Open, select RAW file from dialog, nothing happens. Click process, nothing happens.

Quote from: arrinkiiii on August 23, 2013, 12:43:18 AM
Test ML Raw in Canon 7D in Win7 64bits

Version 1.0.0

Work good in all options. With Force Linear checked it give's me some purple fringe but give's me more big files. More quality with Force Linear?

Version 1.1.0

Work good in all options. But in the dng's all the colors acts strange. The dng's look like they are grey, in some part of the frame or other colors look like they are smooge/ghost image/color. Difficult to explain, if needed i can post some examples.

------

Its possible to load more then one file and output automatic the folders for the several loaded raw files?

I like this piece of software. It's easy to operate and maybe need some more options for configurations. But for me is ideal, extract more quality as possible from the raw file and then i make proxys in after effects with the dng's.

EDIT:

If i compare one dng from raw2dng and other from ML Raw 1.0.0 looks that ML Raw saturate more. Opposite from the rawmagic.

Could you post some DNG examples, comparing the output from raw2dng with the output of ML-RAW (Force Linear disabled)?

Quote from: ewinemiller on August 23, 2013, 12:54:21 AM
I couldn't get 1.1 of either the Mac or Windows version to work.

On Mac click process button, select RAW file from dialog, nothing happens.

On Windows, select File|Open, select RAW file from dialog, nothing happens. Click process, nothing happens.

That's strange, nobody else has had that problem? A directory window should appear for you to select where you want to store the DNG outputs.

You can see the dude with the  blue shirt in the left arm is almost, if not all, in grey.  Also the shoulder and shirt from the dude that got the ball is kind of orange. In the 1.0.0 versions of ml raw didn't give me this strange colors/ghosts.

If you see the trees in the left side is all green you don't see the branches that are brown. Also in the  park bench on the left, the first plank are all green.

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/f4gef0lgmps124z/7s8ZYitJqF

Quote from: arrinkiiii on August 23, 2013, 01:24:13 AM
You can see the dude with the  blue shirt in the left arm is almost, if not all, in grey.  Also the shoulder and shirt from the dude that got the ball is kind of orange. In the 1.0.0 versions of ml raw didn't give me this strange colors/ghosts.

If you see the trees in the left side is all green you don't see the branches that are brown. Also in the  park bench on the left, the first plank are all green.

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/f4gef0lgmps124z/7s8ZYitJqF

That appears to be the same issue I am having.

Does this happen with ALL OS versions? Do you have a small RAW file I can use for testing that shows these artifacts?

Quote from: TheUnkn0wn on August 23, 2013, 02:19:12 AM
Does this happen with ALL OS versions? Do you have a small RAW file I can use for testing that shows these artifacts?

It got 300Mb, its ok?

Quote from: arrinkiiii on August 23, 2013, 02:30:03 AM
It got 300Mb, its ok?

Yes that's fine, I can make it only process the first frames.

Thanks

U welcome. Im going to start to upload but it will take some time, I will put the link here as soon its finish.

Try this, see if this fixes the problem?

WINDOWS - Magic Lantern RAW 1.1.1 (http://puu.sh/48yLO.zip)

ok im going to try it.




(still waiting for the up load. I have upload in dropbox and in sendspace, the first...)

1- No Force Linear, Uncompressed = same strange colors

2- Force Linear, Uncompressed = same strange colors


For me, 7D user, what is different from force linear and unchecked force linear? Beside the big file in Force Linear...


*If i go to File and open a raw file, then i chose my settings... and hit the tab Process, chose my output folder and voilá, it make the magic and give me the dng's. Everything is good, so far... Then i chose different settings, hit the Process tab, chose folder to output... and voilá, it make is magic... BUT wend i go to the output folder i just got black dng's, same amout of frames but all black... with 434kb each dng. Is not possible to correct this? For not all the time need to open/load the same file?

Quote from: arrinkiiii on August 23, 2013, 04:04:28 AM
1- No Force Linear, Uncompressed = same strange colors

2- Force Linear, Uncompressed = same strange colors


For me, 7D user, what is different from force linear and unchecked force linear? Beside the big file in Force Linear...

Force Linear rebuilds the DNG file and processes the information (demozaic) into a more compatible format. I suggest you don't use it unless you have problems without it.

OK, thanks. I will not use Force Linear. I thought since Force Linear produced a larger file (5MB) the dng's would be with more quality, opposite from No Force Linear  that give's me a 1,96MB each dng.

Until now for me the first version, 1.0.0. works good. Only the Force Linear gave me some purple fringe.


*If i go to File and open a raw file, then i chose my settings... and hit the tab Process, chose my output folder and voilá, it make the magic and give me the dng's. Everything is good, so far... Then i chose different settings, hit the Process tab, chose folder to output... and voilá, it make is magic... BUT wend i go to the output folder i just got black dng's, same amout of frames but all black... with 434kb each dng. Is not possible to correct this? For not all the time need to open/load the same file?

Here is the file from last version, 1.1.1 and a black dng for comparing. I think is the same from last version.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/f4gef0lgmps124z/7s8ZYitJqF

Raw file for testing (300MB)
http://www.sendspace.com/file/a50kes

TheUnknown, I am forced to use TIFF from your app. It's fast and really usefull. Can I ask how you are developing them as I get quite a lot of fringeing and color noise? I cannot compare the DNGs as I don't have an app for them.

The colors are wrong because it generates a faulty EXIF ISO value.
I removed the ISO value with exiftool: exiftool -ISO=0 000000.DNG
Now colors are ok. White balance is still off but that's not a problem.

Quote from: TheUnkn0wn on August 22, 2013, 05:02:36 AM

Magic Lantern RAW - 1.1.0

(http://puu.sh/47s8V.png)(http://puu.sh/47s3q.png)(http://puu.sh/47rUh.png)

A simple standalone tool for converting magic lantern RAW video files into DNG or TIF sequences.

Features
- Multi-Threading (makes use of those CPU cores you have)
- Using the Adobe DNG SDK (full DNG support)
- Directly convert to TIF
- Compression (compress your DNG's using Lossless JPEG)
- Force Linear (rebuilds DNG with demosaic CFA data, aimed for use with the 650D/700D since dcraw can't handle their DNG's correctly, I recommend you leave this disabled unless you have a 650D or 700D)

Version
1.0.0 - Initial Release
1.1.0 - Compiled statically, modified multi-threading

Download
WINDOWS (http://puu.sh/48yLO.zip)
LINUX (http://puu.sh/48ojI.0)
MAC (http://puu.sh/48nxl.zip)

I was so excited to try out the app but it doesn't open up on Macs, if there is an Mac user that got to open up I would like to hear from them because it does nothing on my MacBook Pro.

Just test 1.1.0 for Windows :

Windows 7 64 bits
Canon Mark2

1) Dng = are superb, clean, application is fast (open in Resolve and ACR)
2) Tiff = are clean : nothing to say but : thank you !
3) Dng + Force Linear = not possible to open the file in Resolve, but ok in Sony Vegas pro, very nice quality for grading

I really like the way to use this tool very efficent in certains cases.

I hope, you will continue to improve it !
One idea :
when you clic in process, propose to create un file with same name of orginal RAW file (it could be soooooooo great).

Thank you  again from France TheUnkn0wn !

Francis

Quote from: dariSSight on August 23, 2013, 11:07:23 AM
I was so excited to try out the app but it doesn't open up on Macs, if there is an Mac user that got to open up I would like to hear from them because it does nothing on my MacBook Pro.

I just started it and it worked.  What error did you get when you tried to start it ?

Quote from: arrinkiiii on August 23, 2013, 04:29:02 AM
OK, thanks. I will not use Force Linear. I thought since Force Linear produced a larger file (5MB) the dng's would be with more quality, opposite from No Force Linear  that give's me a 1,96MB each dng.

Until now for me the first version, 1.0.0. works good. Only the Force Linear gave me some purple fringe.


*If i go to File and open a raw file, then i chose my settings... and hit the tab Process, chose my output folder and voilá, it make the magic and give me the dng's. Everything is good, so far... Then i chose different settings, hit the Process tab, chose folder to output... and voilá, it make is magic... BUT wend i go to the output folder i just got black dng's, same amout of frames but all black... with 434kb each dng. Is not possible to correct this? For not all the time need to open/load the same file?

Here is the file from last version, 1.1.1 and a black dng for comparing. I think is the same from last version.
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/f4gef0lgmps124z/7s8ZYitJqF

Raw file for testing (300MB)
http://www.sendspace.com/file/a50kes

I can't reproduce your problem. The this is a DNG it just created : http://puu.sh/48MEO.DNG looks fine to me.

Could you try this? http://puu.sh/48MIe.zip

I,d like to try this app on my mac but i crashes before start. I,m on a mac os X version 10.6.8

This pops up in the report

"Exception Type:  EXC_BREAKPOINT (SIGTRAP)
Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000002, 0x0000000000000000
Crashed Thread:  Unknown

Backtrace not available

Unknown thread crashed with X86 Thread State (32-bit):
  eax: 0x8fe44400  ebx: 0x8fe04f4e  ecx: 0x8fe0b83d  edx: 0x00000001
  edi: 0x8fe46dcc  esi: 0x8fe44440  ebp: 0xbfffd8b8  esp: 0xbfffd89c
   ss: 0x00000023  efl: 0x00000246  eip: 0x8fe01065   cs: 0x0000001b
   ds: 0x00000023   es: 0x00000023   fs: 0x00000000   gs: 0x0000000f
  cr2: 0x00001000

Binary images description not available"

Good morning.

Yes, your dng look normal, not like mine. I going try the 1.1.2 version, thank you  :)


Edit:
With version 1.1.2 happen the same that happen in the others versions. Its possible to put a link for the first version (1.0.0.)? I have deleted and want to try again, because is the version that give's me everything good/normal.




@3pointedit and other users...

This is a link for adobe for installing a dngcodec 2.0  with this you can see/preview the dng's in you picture preview, windows explorer, etc... I do not know if it exists for mac but certainly yes.
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5495

Quote from: Danne on August 23, 2013, 01:02:36 PM
I,d like to try this app on my mac but i crashes before start. I,m on a mac os X version 10.6.8

This pops up in the report

"Exception Type:  EXC_BREAKPOINT (SIGTRAP)
Exception Codes: 0x0000000000000002, 0x0000000000000000
Crashed Thread:  Unknown

Backtrace not available

Unknown thread crashed with X86 Thread State (32-bit):
  eax: 0x8fe44400  ebx: 0x8fe04f4e  ecx: 0x8fe0b83d  edx: 0x00000001
  edi: 0x8fe46dcc  esi: 0x8fe44440  ebp: 0xbfffd8b8  esp: 0xbfffd89c
   ss: 0x00000023  efl: 0x00000246  eip: 0x8fe01065   cs: 0x0000001b
   ds: 0x00000023   es: 0x00000023   fs: 0x00000000   gs: 0x0000000f
  cr2: 0x00001000

Binary images description not available"

As I recall Snow Leopard is a bit odd about 64 and 32 bit as it is a hybrid system.   Right click on the application, select "Get Info" and make sure you are running it as a 32-bit application.  If that doesn't help we'll have to wait for TheUnkn0wn to target your platform.  Though you should be able to upgrade to 10.8 without much pain.

Tried to find the 32-bit option as suggested but couldn, t find it. Will upgrade eventually.

Quote from: Danne on August 23, 2013, 01:45:22 PM
Tried to find the 32-bit option as suggested but couldn, t find it. Will upgrade eventually.

It's compiled as a 32-bit binary since it wont compile correctly using 64-bit (it messes the RAW structures up). I don't have a Mac and therefor don't know a lot about them. I highly suggest you upgrade to 10.8



WINDOWS - Magic Lantern RAW 1.0.0 OLD (http://puu.sh/48Rt4.zip)

Version 1.0.0.

Works good and fast
Wend i put the dng's in after effects and make play the video is all scramble, no good.

Version 1.1.2

Works good but problems in the colors.
Wend i put the dng's in after effects and make play everything go's good as should be.



-----------------
Can we merge the first version  and the last version?  ::)

Quote from: arrinkiiii on August 23, 2013, 03:06:22 PM
Version 1.0.0.

Works good and fast
Wend i put the dng's in after effects and make play the video is all scramble, no good.

Version 1.1.2

Works good but problems in the colors.
Wend i put the dng's in after effects and make play everything go's good as should be.



-----------------
Can we merge the first version  and the last version?  ::)

The thing is, I haven't actually changed any of the image processing stuff, I've just changed the way it creates the threads to process the image AND I also cant reproduce the problem on my PC. Your files are fine when I make them.

 Strange it is  :-[   

First version work good with color but scramble the video in after effects. The last version give's me strange color but good playback video in after effects.

What you think it should be the problem?


Edit: Something must be wrong...  In the beginning i thought that was my pc but two different versions one computer, one good colors other bad and the opposite for playback in after effects.

I have uploaded the file from first versions and last version in my dropbox

Its opening on linux now.

Quote from: TheUnkn0wn on August 23, 2013, 03:41:28 PM
The thing is, I haven't actually changed any of the image processing stuff, I've just changed the way it creates the threads to process the image AND I also cant reproduce the problem on my PC. Your files are fine when I make them.

I was hoping it might be related to the fact that both arrinkiiii and I have the 7D.  But if it works fine on your machine that would be ruled out.

Quote from: wheezl on August 23, 2013, 04:41:29 PM
I was hoping it might be related to the fact that both arrinkiiii and I have the 7D.  But if it works fine on your machine that would be ruled out.

Its possible. But first version work good in colors but playing scramble in after effects and last version is the opposite. raw2dng work good also, in colors and in playback.


Edit:
Im in a windows 7 64bits im going try the same raw file in 32bits



Re-Edit:
Different computer, also windows 7 but 32bits

With the last version it's the same with colors, strange colors it give's me.

Hi UnKnown,
so i just tried 1.1.3 for mac and it works like a charm. seems a little faster then 1.1.1 also the DNG with linear uncompressed looks fantastic. also 6.5 MB file, very nice. I have no bugs for you as of yet. But I can mention that the XML seems to be stripped or not carried on because Dimensions aren't transposed to the created files. ( I also like the tiff out option for speedy outputs to Dav Resolove) thanks a lot. Have you considered some sort of file browser? something like RAWmagic? I am asking only to see if you've considered it. I've got NO programming chops so I don't know if it's easy or hard. But, i would still suggest some form of thumbnail preview. (it would make your app the cream of the crop Honestly, because your output seems to mine eyes cleaner than RAWmagic) does your app span files ****.RAW, *****.R00 or do we have to cat them in terminal first? I don't have any spanned files on my drives to try)
Keep up the fantastic development.

outputs 8 bit TIF instead of 16

Quote from: wheezl on August 23, 2013, 11:20:48 AM
I just started it and it worked.  What error did you get when you tried to start it ?

When I click on it, nothing happens it doesn't open up.

Quote from: wheezl on August 23, 2013, 04:41:29 PM
I was hoping it might be related to the fact that both arrinkiiii and I have the 7D.  But if it works fine on your machine that would be ruled out.

Did you already try the new version?  1.1.3  it's working good for me   :D

Buffer oveflows on every version to date on Linux, Ubuntu 64bit 13.04

App fires up ok, terminal shows the usual raw2DNG info about frame size, frame rate, number of frames etc and everything works in the GUI, like browsing to output folder etc, until I hit the PROCESS button, then crashes with either DNG or Tif output chosen.

Oh is 16bit tif possible?

dcraw -4 -T options should export 16 bit TIF

But this uses DNG SDK for the very reason dcraw has problems with 600D & 650D as OP says?

But yes dcraw -4 -T exports 16bit linear tif

Linux OpenSuse 12.3, EOS600D, ML latest ,Magic Lantern RAW - 1.1.3

I can start the program. But if I open a RAW-file,  it crashes with a sigsegfault:

edgar@linux-dfco:~/Downloads> ./mlr.elf
Speicherzugriffsfehler


Edgar

I have tried it on mac 10.8
The app opens up. Nothing more..
No conversion, nothing. Just opens up.
??

Works for me on 10.8 but picky  about what you decompress the archive with.

Quote from: ewinemiller on August 23, 2013, 12:54:21 AM
On Mac click process button, select RAW file from dialog, nothing happens.

Same here. I'm using 1.1.3, 10.8.4 Mountain Lion, 5D II.

Me too 10.8.4 and 5DMKII

EDIT: Let me correct what I put there:

What I meant is that mine is working and that is Mountain Lion 10.8.4, Magic Lantern RAW v1.1.3 with the 5DMKII

Quote from: mageye on August 25, 2013, 02:35:09 PM
Me too 10.8.4 and 5DMKII

We have to see if the people with mac who can make it work are using a 5d ii.

5dmk3 same here

Any chance of a 16bit tif option?

Quote from: 3pointedit on August 26, 2013, 02:17:23 AM
Any chance of a 16bit tif option?

sure, I'm on holiday at the moment (in New York) so I'll have to fix all these bus when I get back (30th)

This wonderful app will have multi load of raw files? Also with automatic output folder for each raw file/dng sequence?

Have a blast in the big apple  8)  ...and cam back fast and safe  ;D

Quote from: arrinkiiii on August 26, 2013, 06:43:18 AM
This wonderful app will have multi load of raw files? Also with automatic output folder for each raw file/dng sequence?

Yess yess Multi load and direct folder, would be more than great : "formidable" !

Francis

1.2.0
- 16-bit TIF
- Fixed colour issues

I will try to add support for MLV when it get merged.

Crash with Buffer Overflow on Linux Ubuntu 13.04 64bit:

Processing Frames...

1/469
*** buffer overflow detected ***: ./unknown terminated
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__fortify_fail+0x63)[0xf73ddbc3]
/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x10593a)[0xf73dc93a].............. etc etc etc
f7755000-f775e000 r-xp 00000000 08:01 17957736                           /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libXcursor.so.1.0.2Aborted

Quote from: TheUnkn0wn on September 01, 2013, 08:31:02 PM
1.2.0
- 16-bit TIF
- Fixed colour issues

I will try to add support for MLV when it get merged.

Tested on Windows 7 64bits without any problems.

I have two questions since I have not used this before but it could speed up my process.

How is the White Balance and Tint adjusted?  I am having a hard time adjusting in tiff.  I usually use ACR auto feature for WB and is very accurate!!
The TIFF have been exported with the standard 25 sharpening which is not good since I get lots of aliasing.  Can they be exported at 0 sharpening?

when i compare son of a batch dngs and magic lantern raw 1.2 dngs the dng looks really different. like there is not so much black information in yours.
the tiff option looks really bad with my raw file.

here is the link of the testfiles

thx for your effort.
sw

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/wtzx0dgimdqqpca/RJtAYZsa22

The TIF images do look like they loose quality, this is due to the rendering done by the Adobe SDK. I'd stick to using DNG's. The DNG's shouldn't be different if Force Linear is UNTICKED.

if you compare the dngs you will see that the wb and some black intensity looks different..
perhaps its just me but the son of a batch dng looks more neutral/correct)

i have not corrected anything in cameraraw.. just compared the images with no settings applied..

Magic Lantern RAW doesn't change any of the settings, you should get the exact same image using RAW2DNG. Son of Batch must be changing the settings.

Quote from: RenatoPhoto on September 01, 2013, 09:24:15 PM
How is the White Balance and Tint adjusted?  I am having a hard time adjusting in tiff.  I usually use ACR auto feature for WB and is very accurate!!

Did you try the cr2-option in raw2cdng1.3.0? It just takes the raw_measured-data from a photo made right before the video. The auto-Setting in ACR is very pleasing, but i wouldnt call it accurate - on the other hand the wb-measuring in the canon-bodies is not that accurate as well.

regards chmee

using 1.2 I processed an ml RAW first as a DNG sequence (works fine), then as a TIF sequence. The (2nd) TIF pass produced only black frames.
I restarted the app and it created TIFs correctly as a first pass.

I loaded the TIF image in Irfanview and noticed that the color count is 16.7 million for both 8 bit and 16 bit. Why would there be additional color information in the 16 bit file?

Great little app BTW, It's really useful for me to test RAW.

This is sooo fast!

But sometimes it simply didn't works. I choose the raw files and nothing happens.

Hi Team,

In Ubuntu 13.10 the problem got fixed after I installed Wine application.

Cheers,
Prabhath MP

Looks great. I guess its time for me to update my workflow

Is there someone who has the skills to understand why it doesn't work on mac? :(

Quote from: togg on October 12, 2013, 01:33:20 AM
Is there someone who has the skills to understand why it doesn't work on mac? :(

Have u tried RAWmagic?  Its fast on Mac.  And u can. Drag and drop from card

I've stopped using it since Resolve was updated with normal dng support :(

Thanks, toog - that's exactly what I was looking to find out: do I need to figure out how to use raw2cdng on a Mac (it's Windows-only, I understand?)

If I can use the latest, free, Resolve Lite on regular DNGs, that's super :)

Quote from: togg on October 13, 2013, 02:19:35 AM
I've stopped using it since Resolve was updated with normal dng support :(

Quote from: Haliburton on October 31, 2013, 04:04:54 AM
Thanks, toog - that's exactly what I was looking to find out: do I need to figure out how to use raw2cdng on a Mac (it's Windows-only, I understand?)

If I can use the latest, free, Resolve Lite on regular DNGs, that's super :)

You can, the problem is that RawMagic allow to convert spanned files directly, support drag&drop ecc. The down side is that cdng take more space and that RawMagic doesn't use neither all the cpu power. But since this app doesn't work for me :(

you have to differentiate the three main cdng-converters:

this one in this thread
Raw Magic for Mac
raw2cdng for Win

You'll find all apps here -> http://magiclantern.wikia.com/wiki/RAW_Video

Quote from: Midphase on August 22, 2013, 10:07:47 AM
Any chance of .mlv format being implemented with this?   ;D

+1
I really wish RAWBatchelor would support MLV as well

Quote from: dogmydog on January 15, 2014, 05:03:12 AM
+1
I really wish RAWBatchelor would support MLV as well

+2

Everytime I try to drag and drop my .raw files (on 3 different computers) nothing happens. I only see a window flash for a split second but that's it. Any idea as to why I can't convert my files? I have tried BATCHelor and one other but nothing happens with those converters either.

I'm using the Linux .elf binary and get a window with almost invisibly small fonts.  Any ideas?  I'm using Mint 16 with xfce.  See screenshot. https://www.flickr.com/photos/rkonrad/sets/72157643442514593/  Thanks!

Hi everybody,

I'm having trouble opening some raw-files as in some earlier comments. All the files that won't open have been larger than ~1GB. I can open them without problems in other similar programs, but Magic Lantern RAW suits my workflow best, so I would like to use it...
I'm using the latest ML-build on a 6D and running ML RAW 1.2.0 on OS X 10.9.2

Any suggestions greatly appreciated!!

Having a similar problem - I open it up, chose my DNG output and click PROCESS then chose my .RAW file, but then nothing happens. Tried opening the .RAW file with the program as well, but no dice.
Any advice? Am I just being a fool and doing it the wrong way?

Thanks a bunch

Virus detected on the Windows .zip..  So that sucks.

I checked the file in virustotal.com which used 55 different virus detection programs/routines.
"Comodo" was the only one detecting malware on this very file.
I'm quite convinced your scanner just made a false alarm. Send the file to their support for analysis.

Files scanned and it's safe.

I will note that I'm getting a runtime error when using this.  However, I do see the files in the folder.