Print Page - CinemaDNG vs ProRes 4444 vs ProRes 422HQ vs H264 All-I

Title: CinemaDNG vs ProRes 4444 vs ProRes 422HQ vs H264 All-I
Post by: meditant on August 06, 2013, 04:54:35 PM

Hello,

I do this vs for my work, if it's can help you !

- CinemaDNG
- ProRes 4444 from Resolve
- ProRes 4444 from raw2dng.app 0.13 (ffmpeg conversion)
- ProRes 422HQ
- H264 All-I

Regards

Title: Re: CinemaDNG vs ProRes 4444 vs ProRes 422HQ vs H264 All-I
Post by: Midphase on August 06, 2013, 08:21:02 PM

I don't speak French, but what I'm getting from this is that CDNG, PR4444 and PR422HQ are all very high quality methods of working with footage in post.

PR4444 generated from Raw2DNG and the h.264 All-I formats on the other hand are to be avoided.

Title: Re: CinemaDNG vs ProRes 4444 vs ProRes 422HQ vs H264 All-I
Post by: meditant on August 06, 2013, 08:28:53 PM

Yes the ffmpeg conversion of raw2dng don't be a good choice, maybe in future version !

The H264 is not to be good than prores but it's a good choice if you don't have hight dynamic scene, and for many type of film is good enough !

Regards

Magic Lantern Forum

Using Magic Lantern => Raw Video => Raw Video Postprocessing => Topic started by: meditant on August 06, 2013, 04:54:35 PM