Magic Lantern Forum

General Discussion => Academic Corner => Topic started by: 70MM13 on May 28, 2022, 01:15:28 PM

Title: ML dual iso in academic study
Post by: 70MM13 on May 28, 2022, 01:15:28 PM
Has everyone seen this paper from 2016?
I'm really curious about thoughts regarding this, particularly the performance of the ML method, from the upper echelons...
Dual iso has so much promise.  It requires a new approach to achieve any of its potential.

https://repositori.upf.edu/bitstream/handle/10230/28210/Bertalmio_ElectronicImaging2016_high.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Title: Re: ML dual iso in academic study
Post by: 70MM13 on May 30, 2022, 08:43:28 PM
does no one have any thoughts about his approach?
Title: Re: ML dual iso in academic study
Post by: names_are_hard on May 30, 2022, 09:12:26 PM
They describe the algorithm, I didn't spend much time on it but it looks like there's enough info to implement it.  If someone was willing to spend the time to do that, it would be possible to compare the methods.

What kind of discussion were you hoping for?
Title: Re: ML dual iso in academic study
Post by: 70MM13 on May 30, 2022, 11:35:05 PM
I'm curious if anyone who is familiar with the current approach would have any thoughts or inspiration resulting from reading it.
Title: Re: ML dual iso in academic study
Post by: names_are_hard on May 31, 2022, 01:10:11 AM
Okay.  Mine is basically: sounds like it would be interesting to test it.
Title: Re: ML dual iso in academic study
Post by: iaburn on February 01, 2023, 11:27:45 AM
I wrote to one of the authors and he said that the solution was quite inefficient and they sadly didn't develop it any further, so no code available.
I guess it could have worked for single images at least.
Title: Re: ML dual iso in academic study
Post by: names_are_hard on February 01, 2023, 08:00:45 PM
That's a shame, academics will nearly always share their code.  At least you tried :)

There's still enough info in the paper to attempt to use the technique, though obviously that's more work.