I'm always looking for ways to get more out of my scripting experiments and came across this, which seems to hint at an alternative exposure bracketing approach.
http://www1.cs.columbia.edu/CAVE/publications/pdfs/Grossberg_CPMCV03.pdf
Any thoughts?
Cheers
Garry
Thanks Garry.
Is this in terms of the cameras inbuilt luminance curve do you know?
The fact that cameras LUTs or whatever the terrible S curve is referred to isn't linear (or a constant logarithmic curve).
@ItsMeLenny
I must say, 'all' I was looking at was the still image bracketing strategy.
It will be interesting what others, like a1ex, think about the idea.
Cheers
Garry
OK, I'll admit I find the paper a little difficult to follow. Nevertheless, since you asked specifically for my opinion, here's my crude attempt at reverse engineering it (actually, the small bits I was able to understand from the paper).
bits-exposures.html (https://a1ex.magiclantern.fm/bleeding-edge/brack/bits-exposures.html)
TLDR: yes, these ideas are worth exploring.
@a1ex
I've emailed the author to see if there is any more insight he can offer.
Let's see if he replies.
Thanks for biting on this ;-)
Cheers and Merry Christmas
Garry
I'm still confused.