Print Page - Why not to have a date + ML-RAW? ;)

Title: Why not to have a date + ML-RAW? ;)
Post by: johannsebastianbach on April 04, 2016, 02:06:08 PM

What we did is recording the sound first, then time-strech it up to 62,5%. Then if filmed with playback at 40FPS (fastest possible for the singer :) ) and slow it down in post to 25FPS it would still be in slow motion, but the lips are synced. 5Dm3, MLV-Lite(+Focus Peak,RAW Zebras). Hand- held and focused.

I would be happy to hear some constructive feedback from you guys!

WHAT CAN BE DONE TO MAKE THIS AWFUL YOUTUBE QUALITY BETTER? (Besides Vimeo)

Title: Re: [5DMKIII] Let Me Love You (lip sync slow-mo)
Post by: _OLLE_ on April 05, 2016, 12:20:10 AM

The sync is great!

Title: Re: [5DMKIII] Let Me Love You (lip sync slow-mo)
Post by: axelcine on April 05, 2016, 05:24:14 PM

Ahh so sweet. Beautiful song. Beautiful girl. Beautiful footage.

Title: Re: [5DMKIII] Let Me Love You (lip sync slow-mo)
Post by: goldenchild9to5 on April 06, 2016, 06:05:27 AM

@johannsebastianbach Great job Beautiful images.. Did you grade using Resolve 12, any LUT's used?

Title: Re: Why not to have a date + ML-RAW? ;)
Post by: johannsebastianbach on April 21, 2016, 05:39:45 PM

Thank's guys, the grading was a combination of LUT's, also film noise was used - which apparently didn't end well for youtube. :)

Magic Lantern Forum

Showcasing Magic Lantern => Share Your Videos => Topic started by: johannsebastianbach on April 04, 2016, 02:06:08 PM