Author Topic: Canon 70D  (Read 1325215 times)

stan101

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2975 on: July 20, 2017, 05:43:01 PM »
Hi all, I recently picked up my 70D after a while and tried to initiate Peak Focusing.. No matter what the setting in global draw, I only get peak focusing in the image review after shooting.. I have the Canon Overlays turned off.

Also, I can't get fast zebras to work at all. The spot metering is only showing up on the review also.

I know I have had zebras working in Live View and I think I had peak focusing working, too but for the life of me I can't recall what I have changed.

Is there any obvious setting other than the Global Draw option that I should be checking? I'm using v 112

a1ex

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10342
  • 5D Mark Free
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2976 on: July 20, 2017, 05:53:56 PM »
Is there any obvious setting other than the Global Draw option that I should be checking?

If there's any precondition you need to set, it should be printed at the bottom of screen and the menu should be grayed out. Otherwise, it's a bug.

RachelFilmsThings

  • Just arrived
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2977 on: July 30, 2017, 06:23:27 AM »



upload image lossless


Hey,

I'm new to Magic Lantern and new to testing the beta for the 70D. Wanted to know if anyone can tell me what's wrong with the video or if it's a bug that is still being worked on.

Best,
Rachel

haldenjente

  • Just arrived
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2978 on: August 06, 2017, 07:30:46 PM »
I can't find a working version for my 70D. Where do i find it?

Walter Schulz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5718
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2979 on: August 06, 2017, 10:10:53 PM »
Go to first post of this thread ...

Loliplol

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2980 on: August 10, 2017, 01:33:40 PM »
Noticed something while filming longer duration videos.

For some reason, it keeps losing the focus. So what I mean is, when I record some close ups, such as wedding rings etc etc it does a wonderful job focusing, quite happy with the footage. But the problem occurs when I move out of the close-up. It basically stays in that close-up focus, does not react anymore. Then I have to go and film random objects around the place to get it back working, and when it starts working it does a perfect job. I have tried this with several lenses and always does the same thing. When I remove ML it stops doing it. And I really don't want to remove it because it's so helpful.

Maybe I'm wrong, correct me if I am. But this has happened to me.

Co2260

  • Just arrived
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2981 on: August 18, 2017, 03:22:52 AM »
Hi,
first let me thank everyone that works on "magic lantern"s programing it's an amazing achievement, THANK YOU!.
 I wanted to buy the 70D thanks to the price drop, but I refuse to buy any camera that doesn't allow magic lantern, for my purposes it's a MUST HAVE.
can someone explain to me how stable is it? - I mean not the fancy 4K raw but the older functions

I basically use 3 functions:
1- focus bracketing for macro (on the 100mm macro 2.8 non "L" version)
2- intervalometer with the exposure bracketing.
3- focus peaking \ live view sharpening increase - for video.

those are the "must have" functions for me. is it safe to buy a camera and hope they'll work?

Zeusjuice

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2982 on: August 20, 2017, 03:54:22 AM »
Hello,

I'm brand new to ML and have already installed Beta -4a.  How do I though record in 10 bit raw using magic lantern?  I only see the 14 bit option.  I realize this answer is somewhere on the forum but being new im having some trouble.  Is there something else I need to add to the sd card from ML? If so do I have to remove ML and start over?  Keep in mind I'm completely new here and would very much appreciate some direct help with all the steps.  I have already loaded the 3 MLV modules.  Thank you in advance for your patience with a noob like myself. 

andy kh

  • Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2983 on: August 21, 2017, 03:49:22 PM »
good news for 70D users. now 10bit/12bit recording works like a charm. playback in the camera is also possible. lets thank Alex for this wonderful job

nikfreak

  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1027
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2984 on: August 21, 2017, 04:16:17 PM »
Despite playback the recordings worked also in test releases:

http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=14309.msg178494#msg178494

@a1ex: as TimerA works for modifying FPS -> what do you think about bringing it back for the public on 70D
70D.112 & 100D.101

andy kh

  • Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2985 on: August 21, 2017, 05:22:46 PM »
Despite playback the recordings worked also in test releases:

http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=14309.msg178494#msg178494

not only playback problem but wrong black level was also a problem. its no more with today's release.

bakersdozen

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2986 on: August 22, 2017, 12:46:32 AM »
Despite playback the recordings worked also in test releases:

http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=14309.msg178494#msg178494

@a1ex: as TimerA works for modifying FPS -> what do you think about bringing it back for the public on 70D
Yes please, I would love to get the bugs ironed out for fps override on 70d

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk


gutosantana

  • Just arrived
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2987 on: August 22, 2017, 05:33:20 AM »
good news for 70D users. now 10bit/12bit recording works like a charm. playback in the camera is also possible. lets thank Alex for this wonderful job

Hi, Andy. What version you are referring to ? I´m new here and want to start using ML on my 70D. Thanks in advance and best regards from Brazil to everyone here!

Walter Schulz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5718
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2988 on: August 22, 2017, 10:15:01 AM »
Top of page -> Downloads -> Downloads (pull down menu) -> Experiments -> 10/12-bit RAW video

fjodor

  • Just arrived
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2989 on: August 22, 2017, 09:09:24 PM »
I am using the new 10/12bit build (21th aug.) recording 10bit raw with audio works perfectly. My sincere gratitude!
But audio is terribly out of sync after conversion with MLV Producer to cDNG, any recommendation for converting 10bit to cDNG on PC for use in Resolve?

Thanks in advance ;)

skrimaging

  • Just arrived
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2990 on: August 23, 2017, 06:53:46 PM »
Top of page -> Downloads -> Downloads (pull down menu) -> Experiments -> 10/12-bit RAW video
Should I download this August 21 10bit/12bit for my 70D or keep using the one from the first page on this thread that states being released back in oct 26 2016? Are there other advantages to installing august 21 build compared to older one linked here?

andy kh

  • Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2991 on: August 24, 2017, 11:27:19 AM »
You should download newer builds, test and report if you find any bugs. I have been using the 21 Aug build without any problem so far. 12/10bit recording works great now. You should try for yourself

Walter Schulz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5718
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2992 on: August 28, 2017, 09:04:56 PM »
See reply 2986

summervibes

  • New to the forum
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2993 on: August 31, 2017, 03:02:06 PM »
after several attempts I do not have a currently supported 70D but once support is added I will be testing

nikfreak

  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1027
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2994 on: August 31, 2017, 06:31:01 PM »
upgrade your firmware to 1.1.2
70D.112 & 100D.101

rileypreston_99

  • Just arrived
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2995 on: September 06, 2017, 01:05:57 AM »
Hi there, hopefully this is the right place to post this. I have been getting some weird bars on my photos. I have a Canon 70D and I am running the latest Canon firmware and the latest Magic Lantern firmware. I am wondering if it is a software issue or a physical issue with my camera. Here are a few examples.







gerk.raisen

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2996 on: September 18, 2017, 03:44:54 PM »
Hello all,

Tried to compile from lastest crop_rec_4k branch
after 2d83b69 (merge of 70D_merge_112 branch into crop_rec_4k)

When compiling I receive the error:

[ CC       ]   exmem.o
In file included from ../../src/exmem.c:3:0:
../../src/exmem.c: In function 'srm_malloc_cbr':
../../src/exmem.c:380:12: error: 'SRM_BUFFER_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function)
     ASSERT(SRM_BUFFER_SIZE == raw_buffer_size);


If I understand correctly seems that the value of SRM_BUFFER_SIZE is not set

It's something that we know or maybe I could help finding it?

tecgen

  • Freshman
  • **
  • Posts: 53
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2997 on: September 18, 2017, 04:02:44 PM »
The value of the SRM_BUFFER_SIZE for the 70D is *not yet* known within the crop_rec_4k branch. Have at the look at the code in the exmem.c class within the branch. You need to copy the printf(...) method call to the unified branch, compile it and run it on a real 70D. You are be able to find the value of the SRM_BUFFER_SIZE within a terminal window. Take this value and write it into the exmem.c class of the crop_rec_4k branch and try to compile it again.

I did the same for the 550D some days ago.
http://www.magiclantern.fm/forum/index.php?topic=19300.msg189699#msg189699
Canon 5D Mark II, 50D, 550D/Rebel T2i, EF 40mm f/2.8 STM, Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8, EF 85 f1.8, EF 135 f2.8 SF, Zoom H2n

gerk.raisen

  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2998 on: September 18, 2017, 06:10:41 PM »
Thanks tecgen,
I've tried to follow you but maybe the exmem.c code is a little too difficult for me :(

I tried to insert the following code in the exmem.c in the 70D_merge_112 branch (70D is still not in unified builds)

Code: [Select]
/* called from RscMgr task */
static REQUIRES(RscMgr) void srm_malloc_cbr(void** dst_ptr, void* raw_buffer, uint32_t raw_buffer_size)
{
    //printf("srm_malloc_cbr(%x, %x, %x)\n", dst_ptr, raw_buffer, raw_buffer_size);

    /* we can't tell how much to allocate; the allocator tells us */
    /* the value is hardcoded in consts.h, for speed (probing is very slow) */
    ASSERT(SRM_BUFFER_SIZE == raw_buffer_size);
   
    /* return the newly allocated buffer in the output variable */
    *dst_ptr = raw_buffer;
   
    /* announce it's done */
    give_semaphore_nc(srm_alloc_sem);
}

I inserted it just after the line

342     static int srm_allocated = 0;

but trying to compile it return me a bunch of errors:

Code: [Select]
[ CC       ]   exmem.o
../../src/exmem.c:345:8: warning: return type defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int]
 static REQUIRES(RscMgr) void srm_malloc_cbr(void** dst_ptr, void* raw_buffer, uint32_t raw_buffer_size)
        ^
../../src/exmem.c: In function 'REQUIRES':
../../src/exmem.c:346:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
 {
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:362:17: error: storage class specified for parameter 'srm_buffer_size'
 static uint32_t srm_buffer_size = 0;
                 ^
../../src/exmem.c:362:1: error: parameter 'srm_buffer_size' is initialized
 static uint32_t srm_buffer_size = 0;
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:365:27: error: storage class specified for parameter 'srm_alloc_sem'
 static struct semaphore * srm_alloc_sem = 0;
                           ^
../../src/exmem.c:365:15: error: parameter 'srm_alloc_sem' is initialized
 static struct semaphore * srm_alloc_sem = 0;
               ^
../../src/exmem.c:368:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
 {
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:388:17: error: storage class specified for parameter 'old_uilock_shutter'
 static uint32_t old_uilock_shutter;
                 ^
../../src/exmem.c:391:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
 {
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:399:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
 {
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:407:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
 {
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:491:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
 {
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:517:1: warning: empty declaration
 struct srm_malloc_buf
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:523:26: error: storage class specified for parameter 'srm_malloc_hSuite'
 static struct memSuite * srm_malloc_hSuite = 0;
                          ^
../../src/exmem.c:523:15: error: parameter 'srm_malloc_hSuite' is initialized
 static struct memSuite * srm_malloc_hSuite = 0;
               ^
../../src/exmem.c:524:30: error: storage class specified for parameter 'srm_malloc_buffers'
 static struct srm_malloc_buf srm_malloc_buffers[10] = {{0}};
                              ^
../../src/exmem.c:524:15: error: parameter 'srm_malloc_buffers' is initialized
 static struct srm_malloc_buf srm_malloc_buffers[10] = {{0}};
               ^
../../src/exmem.c:524:15: warning: braces around scalar initializer
../../src/exmem.c:524:15: note: (near initialization for 'srm_malloc_buffers')
../../src/exmem.c:528:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
 {
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:590:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
 {
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:618:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
 {
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:630:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
 {
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:668:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
 {
 ^
In file included from ../../src/dryos.h:41:0,
                 from ../../src/exmem.c:3:
../../src/tasks.h:160:8: error: parameter 'task_create_exmem_init' is initialized
 struct task_create \
        ^
../../src/exmem.c:674:1: note: in expansion of macro 'INIT_FUNC'
 INIT_FUNC("exmem", exmem_init);
 ^
../../src/tasks.h:162:1: error: section attribute not allowed for 'task_create_exmem_init'
 task_create_##ENTRY = { \
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:674:1: note: in expansion of macro 'INIT_FUNC'
 INIT_FUNC("exmem", exmem_init);
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:674:20: error: 'exmem_init' undeclared (first use in this function)
 INIT_FUNC("exmem", exmem_init);
                    ^
../../src/tasks.h:164:27: note: in definition of macro 'INIT_FUNC'
         .entry          = ENTRY, \
                           ^
../../src/exmem.c:674:20: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
 INIT_FUNC("exmem", exmem_init);
                    ^
../../src/tasks.h:164:27: note: in definition of macro 'INIT_FUNC'
         .entry          = ENTRY, \
                           ^
../../src/exmem.c:345:8: warning: type of 'RscMgr' defaults to 'int' [-Wimplicit-int]
 static REQUIRES(RscMgr) void srm_malloc_cbr(void** dst_ptr, void* raw_buffer, uint32_t raw_buffer_size)
        ^
In file included from ../../src/dryos.h:41:0,
                 from ../../src/exmem.c:3:
../../src/tasks.h:162:1: error: declaration for parameter 'task_create_exmem_init' but no such parameter
 task_create_##ENTRY = { \
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:674:1: note: in expansion of macro 'INIT_FUNC'
 INIT_FUNC("exmem", exmem_init);
 ^
../../src/exmem.c:524:30: error: declaration for parameter 'srm_malloc_buffers' but no such parameter
 static struct srm_malloc_buf srm_malloc_buffers[10] = {{0}};
                              ^
../../src/exmem.c:523:26: error: declaration for parameter 'srm_malloc_hSuite' but no such parameter
 static struct memSuite * srm_malloc_hSuite = 0;
                          ^
../../src/exmem.c:388:17: error: declaration for parameter 'old_uilock_shutter' but no such parameter
 static uint32_t old_uilock_shutter;
                 ^
../../src/exmem.c:365:27: error: declaration for parameter 'srm_alloc_sem' but no such parameter
 static struct semaphore * srm_alloc_sem = 0;
                           ^
../../src/exmem.c:362:17: error: declaration for parameter 'srm_buffer_size' but no such parameter
 static uint32_t srm_buffer_size = 0;
                 ^
In file included from ../../src/dryos.h:41:0,
                 from ../../src/exmem.c:3:
../../src/tasks.h:160:8: error: expected '{' at end of input
 struct task_create \
        ^
../../src/exmem.c:674:1: note: in expansion of macro 'INIT_FUNC'
 INIT_FUNC("exmem", exmem_init);
 ^
../../src/exmem.c: At top level:
../../src/exmem.c:342:12: warning: 'srm_allocated' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
 static int srm_allocated = 0;
            ^
make[1]: *** [../../Makefile.filerules:25: exmem.o] Error 1

Could you please help me a little more step by step? :)

nikfreak

  • Developer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1027
Re: Canon 70D (Beta-4a / 26th Oct)
« Reply #2999 on: September 18, 2017, 07:38:03 PM »
The value of the SRM_BUFFER_SIZE for the 70D is *not yet* known...

a1ex has meanwhile "extended" my initial pull request and you can say that my PR and the one in ML's repo don'T match exactly. I've reintroduce fps override btw in my PR. Still if you follow the source linked in 1st post:

https://bitbucket.org/nikfreak/magic-lantern/branch/70D_merge_fw112

you will find SRM_BUFFER_SIZE
70D.112 & 100D.101